• 001100 010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    But will congress enforce the rules? By enforce, I mean using the power of Impeachment and voting to convict under said Article(s) of Impeachment. Otherwise, any rules are pointless. A president can only be prosecuted after leaving office, how do prosecute a sitting supreme court justice who serves for life? Even if you did, they’d still be a sitting justice that can rule from prison since criminal conviction =/= impeachment conviction, and I’d imagine the case could go up to the very court that he/she sit in, and it only takes 4 of their collegues plus their own vote to overturn their own conviction.

    In this political climate, it’s practically impossible to convict a justice under the impeachment procedure.

    • Zron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      An impeachment is not a criminal trial, the Supreme Court would have no authority to make a decision in an impeachment.

      Impeachment is purely a political tool to remove nefarious actors from the government. So an impeached justice would have his spot on the bench taken away, and then would be a regular citizen who can face trial and imprisonment like any other.

      If they decide to ignore that rule, it’s literally the job the of the president to have them arrested and brought before congress to face their impeachment.

      I would hope if the court tried to play that hand, congress would actually start using their authority and install a new court, but I trust congress to have a spine as much as I trust my 102 year old neighbor to mow his lawn.

      But don’t worry, that would be like the 3rd constitutional crisis we’ve had in 5 years. They’re getting kind of boring now anyway.