“We talk about America’s system of government,” New York Times columnist Ezra Klein said after Trump’s inauguration, “as if it is a solid thing, bound by the constitution and institutions the way a belt cinches around the waist. But it’s really just a pile of norms in a trenchcoat. Knock the norms down and everything changes.” Trump’s very purpose is to knock them down, but in some ways, he is only accelerating a process that had already started.
Take Trump’s order to construct a migrant detention centre in Guantánamo Bay – a space that has for years operated outside international law despite outcries and appeals for closure. Hundreds of prisoners were kept there under military law, often following rendition, disappearance and torture at CIA black sites. Trump’s proposal to detain tens of thousands of migrants there is an outrageous move, but it is not an aberration. He is building, literally, on what came before him. Long before the second Bush administration used the facility to hold and abuse nearly 800 Muslim men and boys as part of its ‘war on terror’. Last year, the Biden administration awarded a private contractor over $160m (£130m) to run the facility.
The same goes for Trump’s withdrawal from international organisations such as the World Health Organization and his imperial adventurism when it comes to foreign policy. The US has a long record, under much more gentlemanly presidents, of breaking international law, insulting international institutions and embarking on unilateral campaigns licensed by its superpower status. Over two decades ago, Congress passed a law authorising “all means necessary and appropriate” to “free US or allied personnel detained by or on behalf of the International Criminal Court”.
The danger comes from assuming that Trumpism comes out of nowhere. In fact, it comes from many sources, but one of them is his predecessors’ creation of a political system in which serial breaches are seen as acceptable because they are done by the right people. Well, to millions of people, Trump is the right person.
Was it not Bernie who fought to keep Biden as candidate, when even Nancy Pelosi wanted Biden out?
You’re suggesting that Bernie not support Biden, the sitting president, for a second term when Biden himself stated that he was staying in the running.
Here’s a comprehensive list of everything the Biden administration accomplished: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/fact-sheet-the-biden-harris-administration-record
Pelosi also hasn’t advocated for the best ideals. We don’t need a moderate, or someone who “reaches across the isle”. We need strong leaders who push for meaningful change for the American people.
Okay… That is the point… Can you not see the irony in Bernie’s stronger support for the establishment than Pelosi?
Bernie isn’t supporting the establishment. He’s voted against democrats when they’re wrong or not pushing for enough.
He is against sending aid to Israel.
He authored a bill for Medicare for all.
His voting record is not available (or at least, it isn’t loading for me) or I would give you more examples: https://www.sanders.senate.gov/issues/legislation/voting_record/
I’m doing a lot of the heavy lifting for you here. You still have not provided a source of any kind indicating that Bernie is for the establishment.
Bernie voted in favor of sending missiles to defend the ethnostate. Furthermore Bernie endorsed Biden. Which sent those arms.