• Impulsivedoorholder@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The true dispair is knowing that the ones primarily responsible for the issues we are facing (private jets, mega yachts, hundred million dollar properties, etc.) are completely untouchable by us.

    We just get to watch in horror as our world decays and the rich get richer.

    • exi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know where you take that from but the super rich are a tiny tiny fraction of the problem. They don’t buy containerships full of stuff, they don’t eat millions of animals per day, they don’t constitute the vast majority of travel.

      Yes, on a per person basis they have an extremely large footprint, but it’s still a drop in the bucket compared to the industries that feed the consumption of the average citizens.

      • WhiteHawk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Industries that pollute so much because the rich are spending their money lobbying against laws that could stop them

        • exi@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s in no way a rich people thing. Polluting less often means that stuff people are used to will cost more or will be less available.

          The greens in Germany suggested that maybe meat is too cheap and people should eat it less and maybe also don’t drive your car so much. And a good chunk of the population lost their fucking mind at the audacity to suggest doing something in two sectors that massively contribute to climate change.

          The reality is that effective action against climate change is hugely unpopular and politicians realize that it’s often political suicide because people hate change and there is no way to combat climate change without lifestyle changes for every single citizen.

          • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The cold hard truth is our societies need to change from the ground up but it’s a death sentence for any politician to lobby for the changes required. Imagine if a politician came out and said “meat is now banned” and “petrol is now banned”? They would be laughed into obscurity.

            We are fucked because we do not yet want off this ride. We want our cheap consumption. The fix is nuanced and multi-facetted and I don’t know if we will get there. Look for geo-engineering to science us out of this. We aren’t going to do the right thing. We’d rather seed the ozone with sulfer dioxide to lower the earth temp.

    • Nepenthe@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I mean, they’re quite literally not, though. All it takes is luck, firepower, and someone willing take out Taylor Swift.

      I’m sure it will have to get one fuck of a lot worse before people in that tax bracket catch it from their own security, but if enough people are self-sacrificing for long enough, they may even have to outlaw guns or something. Which would at least give my wretched corpse a chuckle.