This LPT doesn’t violate the community rule against illegal advice because in this purely hypothetical scenario the law means nothing

  • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    SCOTUS is irrelevant? Really???

    Let’s go ahead and ignore that absurd take.

    How would he have the means to achieve that?

    Edit: No explanation given, just drama and flouncing. Duly noted.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Let’s go ahead and ignore that absurd take.

      Why would anyone want to interact with someone acting like this?

      It’s a rhetorical question by the way, I’ll never see your response or any other comments you ever make.