I know Nebula is not exactly open source, but it is pitched as a creator-controlled (or, at least a creator-centric) platform.

YouTube is my main platform of media consumption, and I would prefer to find other avenues that are not quite as monolithic.

Has anyone here tried Nebula? Is it worth it, and is there anything sketchy about it I should be aware of?

  • GissaMittJobb
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    12 hours ago

    That being said, from what I am aware of, Nebula still pays creators more than YouTube per view.

    I think it’s really important that we stop talking in terms of payment on a per-view basis - Nebula does not pay on a per-view basis. Nebula uses the same model as music streaming companies, i.e. a pro rata stream share model. This means that creators get paid based on how large of a percentage of the total streaming time was on their content. No additional money is generated for each view, it’s conceptually still a fraction of what you pay monthly. The more content you view on the platform, the less each view conceptually pays.

    • AlexWIWA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Wait so YouTube premium actually has a better pay split model (per view.)

      This is a bizarre turn of events. The only reason I was interested in nebula is because I thought it was paid by my personal watch time.

      • aim_at_me@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        “better” is subjective. There’s a pie, and creators get a portion of that pie depending on their portion of the volume of total views. It’s a pretty fair and sustainable way for the company to pay creators decently.

        So they do get paid by your personal views, but your subscription isn’t individually divided. Every subscription is.

        The better part comes from, they get paid more per view than from YouTube.