• alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I agree.

    There is a lot of BS about setting an example and punishing them, but I have not seen anyone who actually knows how the process works say anything remotely like that.

    It would also be a massive case of the EU cutting off it’s nose to spite it’s face. That’s just not how the EU rolls.

    The normal process of joining has requirements geared towards poor peripheral countries that the UK already meets or exceeds.

    The UK can join anytime it wishes and there is even a lot of room to negotiate mutually beneficial terms.

    • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I do think it would be fair to require them to adopt the Euro this time around, for example. But even if that doesn’t happen as long as everyone is better with the UK in then it’s worth it.

      • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 minutes ago

        It would feel fair, but it’s also not that important for either the EU or the Euro itself.

        The Euro is really a 1990s invention, when cash was dominant. Now that all payments are digital, it really doesn’t matter if countries use the Euro or their own currency.

      • Pringles@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Any country joining the EU pledges to join the euro, but there are no deadlines defined and there is little animo to push countries to join, but technically it’s part of the deal.

    • gajustempus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      you are aware you just gave THE best plea on why the EU should NOT think about letting UK back in, right?