• NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yeah, a lot of this is congressional mandated funding. You can’t just take that away with the swipe of a pen. If congressional doesn’t act, or many lawsuits don’t get filed to challenge this, we really are living in the beginnings of a fascist regime, and we are meekly accepting it.

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      we really are living in the beginnings of a fascist regime, and we are meekly accepting it.

      Ding ding ding

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The thing is, you can maybe take it to court, but the suspension itself while a court examines it might be disruptive.

      It looks like there are a number of federal loans preferentially extended to a number of groups (black-owned businesses, female-owned businesses, etc) by the Small Business Administration. If Trump intended to end minority-preferential lending, say, I could see that going over well with people who voted for him, but across-the-board temporary suspension while it’s evaluated seems to me like it’d make a lot of people out there who voted for him unhappy.