• MLRL_Commie [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I was trying to test its ability to make anything sounding sensible by asking about how a book’s take on a topic related to a party program, but was genuinely surprised that it shut me down and gave me the “out of scope” when I asked it to apply Xi Jinping’s theories to a party in my country. I guess it makes sense that they don’t want to let an AI talk for Xi, but I figured it would at least say like “Xi’s theories focus on development in a sustainable way, and this party does not” or something. But it just said “nope” lol

    Still pretty damn good at the actually good use cases of AI though

    • Mardoniush [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      49 minutes ago

      It is a bit hit and miss. I’ve gotten good results by asking it to compare and contrast.

      One thing I’ve noticed is that when discussing western socialism it tends to fall into activist speak really quickly. Sometimes I feel I’m reading the Green-Left Weekly.

    • bobs_guns@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It’s out of scope because what you should do in your own country depends on specific circumstances of that country that it could not possibly know about. It’s correct to shut that down.

      • MLRL_Commie [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Lol Im not saying it should’ve answered me correctly, I was testing how well it could simulate by asking difficult questions. I wasn’t going to believe its answer. I also asked it about my field of work to see how well it could mimic stuff there. I get what you’re saying, but fortunately not needed