• darkcalling@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 hours ago

    US building of internet firewall against China intensifies

    On the other hand:

    This would also give residents the freedom to use popular social platforms like Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter, contributing to Shanghai’s growth as a global economic hub.

    Why. Why. Why would you allow these of all things? They should have to abide by Chinese law, operate from Chinese servers, censor according to Chinese government regulations, etc. All of which in the past they’ve refused. Besides that they’re all brainrotting garbage by design.

    It does make me wonder though. Someone mused about China striking a deal with Trump, they’d allow in US social media companies in exchange for the US allowing Tiktok. It’s the one thing that might placate Zuck and Musk. But it’s very risky.

    Absolutely on par with the risk they incurred in allowing all the liberalization and foreign capital penetration. That corruption very nearly succeeded in growing to the heights necessary to risk the party’s rule and state security. So let us hope it’s a carefully thought through decision rather than a hasty trade made for the expediency of keeping the door open. Opportunities for reaching the west but also risks.

    Put another way, if the west themselves don’t slam the door shut on Chinese internet users and Americans interacting within 5 years it’s because of one of two things: 1) They’ve somehow accepted defeat and/or been entirely bought off or much more likely 2) They have the upper hand in the deal and are setting up spy rings, terrorist rings, and theft of technology rings at such a pace that they think they’ll be ahead to leave it open longer. In other words China should be very suspicious if the US doesn’t in the near future move to cut this all off and slam down a firewall. I do hope the American people see too much before that happens and that maybe yet we might live to see class consciousness and something better within the next 30 years.

    • MelianPretext@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      A Glasnost shill like the 20th century history-ignorant “Party” members in Shanghai who apparently proposed this slop don’t understand anything beyond liberal idealism. This would be a complete negation of everything China has done in resisting Meta/Google/Twitter since the late 2000s. What this Gorbachevite (I’m being generous here because at least Gorbachev was forced to frame his rhetoric under a Marxist veneer) is proposing is an outright surrender to the Western internet oligopoly and not even trying to negotiate concessions but a straight up unilateralist.

      The reason why the entire TikTok ban circus even occurred is that while the West talks about freedom of speech in words; in deeds, they are totalitarian in their obsession of seeking to enforce total information and narrative control across internet space. This lib is either cluelessly naive, having drunk from a spiked punch bowl that the West itself refuses to touch, or a Yakolev style comprador-in-waiting. Given all the liberal dogwhistling in this article on how this proposal is being framed: “learning from developed countries”; “give residents the freedom”; “restoring international internet access”; “helping Shanghai align with international norms”; this may be a straight up anti-communist freak given how he skirts around the reasons why the Party initiated these GFW policies in the first place.

      On the other hand, justifying like this as because “openness has become the norm today,” while the US itself is simultaneously trying to ban and forcibly divest Chinese social media platforms at the same time is hilariously out of touch and this might just be a skyscraper-dwelling moron whose feet haven’t touched ground level in a half a decade.

      • trashxeos@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Not to mention, the focus on western products like ChatGPT, whose training data is heavily anticommunist and probably somewhat sinophobic, too. Facebook and it’s subsidiaries (fuck you Zuck, I’m not calling it M***) are full of anti China anti communist etc bullshit. This screams like someone who assumes that the west will engage in actual good faith exchange of products and services. I really hope Beijing puts the brakes on this and fast!

    • davel [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Someone mused about China striking a deal with Trump, they’d allow in US social media companies in exchange for the US allowing Tiktok.

      I doubt the Chinese state cares about TikTok’s fate w/r/t the US. Despite what the US government and US media say, I think it’s pretty much not their circus, not their monkeys.

      • sevenapples@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        US gained some control of TikTok after it went back online for Americans (people getting banned for saying free Palestine) so I don’t understand why China needs to give further concessions