• ֆᎮ⊰◜◟⋎◞◝⊱ֆᎮ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It doesn’t.

        I see only two ways forward. One homogenous society working together, or much smaller, more “tribal” groups of people almost back to the hunter/gatherer style of society, but this would require a massive depopulation of the Earth.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I guess we’ll see what happens. Although, China seems to be doing fine with 1.4 billion people. So, perhaps there are systems that can work in a large society after all. We’ll see how their experiment goes forward.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              They’re not immune to climate change, but they are in best position to adapt to it. Certainly possible that there’s going to be no way to adapt if things unravel fast enough. However, having domestic supply chains, nuclear power generation, indoor farming, and so on will all go a long way. China has demonstrated the ability to marshal resources in coordinated fashion unlike any other nation, if anybody has a chance of getting through climate change it’s definitely China.

              • ֆᎮ⊰◜◟⋎◞◝⊱ֆᎮ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                We’ll see. I don’t think any country is going to weather the upcoming climate apocalypse without heavy casualties.

                Large swaths of the currently habited Earth are going to be unlivable and possibly within a decade or less.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Oh I completely agree, billions of people are likely to die at this point, and I don’t see how that can be averted. The big question now if any semblance of our technological civilization can survive this process or not. I’m also expecting massive world instability as a result of the climate breakdown. Countries will go to war over remaining livable land. There will be huge refugee crises as people flee parts of the world that are no longer habitable. Global supply chains will rapidly breakdown, and countries that rely on them will implode internally.

                  The three main aspects will be access to resources, food production, and energy supply. If a country has energy production secured then it can start creating temperature controlled environments for people to live in and to grow food. This would be a large scale project that would require a huge amount of central planning and coordination to pull off. And the country would need access to material resources in order to build out this infrastructure.