• NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Vegetables aren’t actually a thing though. Just a bunch of things we grouped because we like eating them.

      • Zwiebel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes there is. Taxonomists aren’t the only people who give meaning to words

            • kadup@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              They are correct. You’re not wrong, whales are indeed mammals. But “fish” isn’t a monophyletic grouping, meaning you either need to give up on using it as a category or you need to correct it by including everyone sharing the same LCA, meaning mammals would be part of your “fish” grouping.

              Of course, that’s how it works within biological classification. Colloquially, you can call them anything.

              • 🕸️ Pip 🕷️@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                20 hours ago

                Just gonna copy paste what I told the other guy:

                I understand that and completely agree, but comparing taxonomical categories with common categorizations such as “fish” is also missing a big point. You can make better comparisons to get people to understand that taxonomy is made up and not reliable to follow religiously, barely even works as a guideline

                • Masterkraft0r@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  What they are trying to say: One cannot taxonomically group every animal we consider fish without also including all the mammals and i think even reptiles and birds. that’s because there are multiple taxonomic branches of fish that split off of the trunk before our ancestors started to walk on land, and not all of the fish in our branch decided to go on land, and continued their own branch. therefore yes: whales are fish and so are you. what does this mean? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

                  it is technically correct which is, of course, the best kind of correct.

                  • 🕸️ Pip 🕷️@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    20 hours ago

                    I understand that and completely agree, but comparing taxonomical categories with common categorizations such as “fish” is also missing a big point. You can make better comparisons to get people to understand that taxonomy is made up and not reliable to follow religiously, barely even works as a guideline