seasonone@opidea.xyz to Technology · 1 year agoUK Version of "Online Harms Bill" wants to prefilter content without due processeasydns.comexternal-linkmessage-square2fedilinkarrow-up137arrow-down13cross-posted to: unitedkingdom@feddit.uktechnology@beehaw.orgtechnology@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up134arrow-down1external-linkUK Version of "Online Harms Bill" wants to prefilter content without due processeasydns.comseasonone@opidea.xyz to Technology · 1 year agomessage-square2fedilinkcross-posted to: unitedkingdom@feddit.uktechnology@beehaw.orgtechnology@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
minus-square𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoI wonder what the real need for this bill is, especially when it’s filthy easy to download a VPN app, and HTTPS exists?
minus-squareszederzlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoThey want to scan the content before you could send it. What I read, the proposed solution would work like a keylogger. The sent message is e2e encrypted, but you couldn’t trust the device you send it with.
I wonder what the real need for this bill is, especially when it’s filthy easy to download a VPN app, and HTTPS exists?
They want to scan the content before you could send it. What I read, the proposed solution would work like a keylogger. The sent message is e2e encrypted, but you couldn’t trust the device you send it with.