• distantsounds@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d suggest reading the article. It’s here in the comments several times. The video of the hearing is well worth watching and pretty significant. That video is also here in the comments.

    • hoodatninja@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Name one part of that hearing that was significant, because not only did he not have any evidence, he didn’t have any evidence that there is evidence. I watched it and frankly I want my time back.

      This is the UFO equivalent of “my uncle works at Nintendo.”

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes a person specifically employed to find information who then reports said information is 100% the same as dumb shit you said on a playground.

        Exactly the same.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You have definitely not seen the hearing and it is beyond weird that you’d pretend otherwise on the internet.

            • hoodatninja@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m being very honest here when I say I want to be wrong. Can you tell me what to revisit? What seemed revelatory or important to you?

              • SCB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                The evidence and witness info provided have the committee members calling for a select committee with subpoena powers.

                When Grusch said “I can’t say that here” that was never going to be the end of that discussion

                • hoodatninja@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  > > > select committee with subpoena powers > >

                  That’s literally every house committee by default.

                  > > > when Grusch said “I can’t say that here” that was never going to be the end of that discussion > >

                  That tells us a literally nothing other than he was unwilling to do it or unable because of a myriad of potential reasons.

                  In that entire hearing those are literally the only two things that made you think this is credible?

                  • SCB@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    A select committee is not “every committee by default.” A select committee is a specific committee.

                    Also you may want to revisit the last sentence of paragraph 1.

                    And no, the entire hearing was credible.

                    Frankly if it’s nothing, you don’t have to give a shit. The members of Congress think it’s something, and I agree with them.