• hoodatninja@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Name one part of that hearing that was significant, because not only did he not have any evidence, he didn’t have any evidence that there is evidence. I watched it and frankly I want my time back.

    This is the UFO equivalent of “my uncle works at Nintendo.”

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes a person specifically employed to find information who then reports said information is 100% the same as dumb shit you said on a playground.

      Exactly the same.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You have definitely not seen the hearing and it is beyond weird that you’d pretend otherwise on the internet.

          • hoodatninja@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m being very honest here when I say I want to be wrong. Can you tell me what to revisit? What seemed revelatory or important to you?

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The evidence and witness info provided have the committee members calling for a select committee with subpoena powers.

              When Grusch said “I can’t say that here” that was never going to be the end of that discussion

              • hoodatninja@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                > > > select committee with subpoena powers > >

                That’s literally every house committee by default.

                > > > when Grusch said “I can’t say that here” that was never going to be the end of that discussion > >

                That tells us a literally nothing other than he was unwilling to do it or unable because of a myriad of potential reasons.

                In that entire hearing those are literally the only two things that made you think this is credible?

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  A select committee is not “every committee by default.” A select committee is a specific committee.

                  Also you may want to revisit the last sentence of paragraph 1.

                  And no, the entire hearing was credible.

                  Frankly if it’s nothing, you don’t have to give a shit. The members of Congress think it’s something, and I agree with them.

                  • hoodatninja@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    The members of Congress who participated in this should be embarrassed they paraded this nonsense around. Nothing new was learned. I promise you we have heard nothing of value and we won’t later. If there is real info about it this is not the pipeline that information is flowing down.