• Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I had an electrodynamics textbook (Griffiths) that was the worst since it did this all the time.

    It made studying it really hard because it skipped so many intermediate steps that I couldn’t follow it and ended up even more confused.

    It was one of the few courses I ended up with a C in, despite trying really hard at it.

    It’s one of the reasons I ended up in engineering rather than physics or mathematics. The numbers are more intuitive and everything isn’t an obscure proof.

  • A_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 days ago

    Albert Einstein is said to have stated: “If you can’t explain it simply, you don’t understand it well enough.” i say : pedagogy is as important as mathematics.

  • affiliate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    the fun thing about this is that the textbooks get more judgy the more advanced the material gets. heres an example from a graduate level algebra textbook by lang.

  • Dicska@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    I just absolutely love the transition from the bottom left bit to the next one. Diffemples.

  • dalekcaan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    I.E. “I don’t feel like writing out the proof.” See also: “this is left as an exercise for the reader.”