• TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 hours ago

    It’s not like that’s new? They already gotta trespass people. Just an open door policy leads to people being even shittier because that’s corporate policy so you can’t kick me out and blah blah blah.

    Just like… there’s a lot of other bullshit to be mad at Starbucks over this really doesn’t matter compared to their union busting or other bullshit.

    • Windex007@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      If someone is going to get belligerent about being asked to leave, I promise you that their beligerence is complete unphased by corporate policy.

      • TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Uhg I wrote a post and got sidetracked before hitting post RIP.

        Anyways point was more about being able to ask people to leave at all (from what I remember the change was very you can’t kick people out cuz the Philly store did a no no. Maybe that changed after the initial backlash or maybe I’m misremembering it as a specific person my friend who was a manager at the time wasn’t allowed to kick out for some specific reason, idk man it’s been ages since my friends worked there and since that change.) but also mostly just… idk I am not particularly saying it’s super good and perfect change just that it doesn’t seem like a big deal either way. People are acting like this is some big evil change and I don’t get it. Like it’s Starbucks, they’re a for profit company not a public park I don’t see why this matters much one way or the other. They weren’t offering some beautiful after school enrichment or anything super crazy they’re just going back to their old policy.