Doug Holland@lemmy.worldM to AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoProblem solved.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square263fedilinkarrow-up1674arrow-down130
arrow-up1644arrow-down1imageProblem solved.lemmy.worldDoug Holland@lemmy.worldM to AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square263fedilink
minus-squareramble81@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·3 days agoYou can have islands that belong to countries, why not land locked enclaves! (Yes I under logistics and such)
minus-squarejoostjakob@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·3 days agoPlenty of countries have those. There’s even exclaves within enclaves.
minus-squareXtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down1·3 days agoWhat if we just take the empty parts of WY and MT to connect CO?
minus-squarelars@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·3 days ago empty parts of WY and MT is redundant 😊
You can have islands that belong to countries, why not land locked enclaves! (Yes I under logistics and such)
Plenty of countries have those. There’s even exclaves within enclaves.
What if we just take the empty parts of WY and MT to connect CO?
is redundant 😊