marxisthayaca [he/him,they/them]@hexbear.net to politics@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 days agoC-Span | Supreme Court Hears Case on TikTok Banwww.youtube.comexternal-linkmessage-square70fedilinkarrow-up143arrow-down10
arrow-up143arrow-down1external-linkC-Span | Supreme Court Hears Case on TikTok Banwww.youtube.commarxisthayaca [he/him,they/them]@hexbear.net to politics@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square70fedilink
minus-squareedge [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·2 days ago“This law isn’t regulating the US users in any way.” It’s literally banning a widely used platform of speech for them.
minus-squareedge [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·edit-22 days agoKJB: “Isn’t the point that the content of TikTok would change under a new owner?” Sotomayor: “How is the post-divestiture provision about the algorithm not a speech impediment?” Yeah, the Justices don’t really seem to be buying it.
“This law isn’t regulating the US users in any way.”
It’s literally banning a widely used platform of speech for them.
KJB: “Isn’t the point that the content of TikTok would change under a new owner?”
Sotomayor: “How is the post-divestiture provision about the algorithm not a speech impediment?”
Yeah, the Justices don’t really seem to be buying it.