• TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    wow that is an obtuse comparison

    that is like claiming the grocery store is stealing from you for charging for goods.

    • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      What do you mean? They’re literally restricting random link clickers from reading their articles

      Oh, I’d also say that 404 media deserves to burn down for being dicks

      • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, not really clearing up the point you’re trying to make.

        And showing that you obviously got an axe to grind with quite well regarded journalists sure is… a strategy…

      • datavoid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        If you were determined to read this article for free, I’m certain there is a way.

        That being said, I don’t think the issue here is with 404 Media. The majority of news sites operate this way - if people are given the option to donate, 99.9% of them just won’t. Whoever is researching and writing these articles (a team of 4 people by the sounds of it) likely need to eat and pay rent. Personally I feel better about not paying for something like NYT or Washington Post than I do for a smaller and apparently less corrupt site like 404.

        • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 hours ago

          This is a free article. They require an account on the site to read even the free articles, and that’s just plain bullshit