The reverse of that post I’ve made a week ago…

Rules: pick one movie or series and explain why you actually enjoyed it despite the criticism.

For me: The JJ Abrams Star Trek movies, by far the best ST stuff ever made, I couldn’t take seriously the original universe with the dated effects and stiff acting, same goes for NG… These movies did ST actually great looking and much more believable, not just the effects.

  • D1G17AL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    Super Mario Bros. with Bob Hoskins and John Leguizamo. I don’t care how bad it is. It’s in the campy so-bad it’s good pool of movies and nothing anyone says can change my mind. The fact that they were drunk off their asses just makes it even funnier in my opinion.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m not even going to call it a guilty pleasure, but Josie and the Pussycats was a movie that I genuinely adored long before people started to appreciate it for the satire that it is.

    As a CIS male I got endlessly mocked, but I stuck to my guns.

  • BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Not sure if it was HATED, but Hook if we’re going by reviews. I can’t imagine any kid seeing that movie and not loving it though.

  • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 days ago

    Wild Wild West has a 16% on Rotten Tomatoes but I genuinely enjoy that film. League of Extraordinary Gentlemen also at 16% and also a movie I enjoyed

    • Landless2029@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Fun fact. Will Smith passed up playing Neo in the Matrix for WWW. I think we got the better deal but it’s fun to picture it.

  • Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    The Postman. Compared to other post apocalyptic cheese fests it feels like a more nuanced display of societal breakdown and the re-emergence of the barter economy.

  • psion1369@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 days ago

    Johnny Mnemonic. Keanu cannot act for shit in it, the story isn’t exactly gripping, hell the action in it is somewhere in the shitter. Oh, and Henry Rollins is a nerdy doctor. All if it adds up to a campy trip of slop that triggers my guilty pleasure.

  • tehmics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    As a non-fan, I thought the JJ Abrams Star Trek movies were well received. All the casual trek fans around me seemed to like them, at least

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Lucy.

    It’s a really fun action/sci-fi flick. I don’t know why people dismiss it for being scientifically inaccurate. Who went into it thinking it was realistic? LoL.

  • wolfpack86@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    TV, but same idea…

    I didn’t particularly hate Dexter season 5. The later seasons were worse, and of course it doesn’t hold a candle to season 4… But I just don’t get the flat out hate. It was fine, and I kinda liked it.

  • TheBrideWoreCrimson@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Matrix 2 & 3. I don’t see, or watch, them as separate movies. Rather, together with Matrix 1, they form one big masterpiece for me. But I can see that it doesn’t really fit the 100 minutes format audiences came to expect, and breaking it in three parts did not do it any good. Plus, I guess I’m just a fan of long movies as I’ve also sat through the original, restored “Until the End of the World,” which runs for about 5 hours.

    • damo_omad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      When I binged all 3 movies I realised that 2 and 3 should be watched together as a single film, it makes it so much better

    • runjun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I get quite annoyed when people talk trash about 2 and 3. If it’s not for you then that’s fine but saying they’re not good really gets under my skin.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Matrix 2 and 3 were films that always got a bad rep, but were alright if you sat down and watched them.

      Matrix 4 is… best left forgotten, and I say that as someone who likes Indy 4

    • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Yea I’m with you on this. They expand on an otherwise superb unit in a rather intricate way, bringing in so much lore and characters, complexifying the stakes, that I can see how they can be perceived as diluting a very pure work of art, and losing the beautiful esoterism of the first. But it’s two of those films you need to watch several times to wrap your head around and appreciate rightfully. Just like The Big Lebowski, in a different way