• Oderus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    Hot take: Let people enjoy what they want. Hypercars and planes are much worse than pick-up trucks.

    • GetPsyched@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Let’s not. Some people’s enjoyment causes a lot of pain for other people, and sometimes i mean literally

      • Oderus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        As long as the government lets people buy trucks, people will buy trucks.

        Rich people jet-setting in their private are far worse than trucks but I rarely hear anyone talking about banning planes.

        • kobra@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          This is all I see. Instead of literally eating the rich, we’re going to pile on ignorant dudes that buy big trucks. Sure, they’re a problem but they pale in comparison to what corporations and super wealthy are doing.

          It’s mind blowing that it keeps working for the rich.

        • Telemachus93@slrpnk.net
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          but I rarely hear anyone talking about banning planes.

          Then do it, but in your own post.

          I mean that literally, it would be good to ban private planes and cut down usage of other airplanes drastically. However using that to discredit people talking about other drivers of climate change is just plain whataboutism and sabotaging the movement.