• PolydoreSmith@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Part of me always felt that the whole “Gore lost because of Nader” narrative was started to discourage third party candidates from running at all. We desperately need strong alternatives to the Republicans and Democrats in this country.

    • DrZaious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We have to sway the the country more to the left, before a third party progressive candidate has a remote chance of winning anything. The United States is far more right wing than most Americans realize, that’s why Bernie refused to run as a third party candidate. Doing so would have handed Trump the win by splitting the votes in the left.

      Unfortunately there’s a lot of money behind pushing the country further to the right. The only chance we have is GenZ actually going out and voting, using their majority to push this county back to where it should be.

    • islandofcaucasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think it was some conspiracy to stop 3rd party voters, the fact is Bush won by ~500 votes and nader got almost 100k votes. He wasn’t remotely close to a real candidacy, but those 100k voters would have very likely not voted for Bush had nader not been on the ticket.

      • red_october@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you looked at the number of registered Democrats who turned and voted for Bush in Florida that year, it’s higher than Nader’s vote total. It’s on Clinton and Gore for their “triangulation” bullshit. And the Supreme Court for helping Dubya and co. steal it.