Like A Duck@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agoAre you a 10?programming.devimagemessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up1423arrow-down132
arrow-up1391arrow-down1imageAre you a 10?programming.devLike A Duck@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square22fedilink
minus-squareFilthyShrooms@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI did that because in coding, you start counting at zero, so 00=0, 01=1, 10=2, and 11=3. Therefore, if I’m a 10 out of 11, then I’d be a 2 out of 3. However, there are 4 options total, so saying 3/4, or 75% is more accurate.
2/3? why? that’s strangely arbitrary…
I did that because in coding, you start counting at zero, so 00=0, 01=1, 10=2, and 11=3. Therefore, if I’m a 10 out of 11, then I’d be a 2 out of 3. However, there are 4 options total, so saying 3/4, or 75% is more accurate.
Still better than 10 / 99