Especially in imperial countries where the kids have to deliberately go along with many wrong history lessons?

I don’t have kids, Matt Christman having one just makes me wonder how he and other Communist parents do it.

  • kristina [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    This is kinda nonsense to me, Marxist theory is strictly logical, Marx doesn’t make emotional or empathetic pleas in Das Kapital or something. Yes, you can be an empathetic communist to great effect, but I don’t think its even close to mandatory (and the proof is in how many shitty communists there have been historically, looking at you Beria). The whole point of Marxism is that its in the best interest of everyone, even the bourgeoisie, to apply Marxist theory. After all, if the bourgeoisie allows society to deteriorate their heads will be on platters.

    • GaveUp [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Understanding Marxist theory is a result of logical steps but agreeing with Marxist theory comes from empathy with the working class

      Difference between all the Wall St. dipshits that read Marx to better understand how to make more money and bourgeois class traitors

      The whole point of Marxism is that its in the best interest of everyone, even the bourgeoisie, to apply Marxist theory. After all, if the bourgeoisie allows society to deteriorate their heads will be on platters

      Humans live a pretty short lifespan, it’s way more in their interests to suppress a revolution until they can die of old age imo

    • TheBroodian [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      12 days ago

      While you’re right about Marxism being scientific, and not based in emotion, I think it’s important to ask, “Why would Marx care about any of this shit to develop such theory in the first place?” And I think any reasoning that didn’t somehow arrive at some conclusion that included empathy would be erroneous. I think that’s also true when asked about why any communist is a communist.