☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.ml to History@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 days agoAlmost Everything in “Dr. Strangelove” Was Truewww.newyorker.comexternal-linkmessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up172arrow-down10cross-posted to: usahistory@lemmygrad.ml
arrow-up172arrow-down1external-linkAlmost Everything in “Dr. Strangelove” Was Truewww.newyorker.com☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.ml to History@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square13fedilinkcross-posted to: usahistory@lemmygrad.ml
minus-squareDolores [love/loves]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26·2 days agowas anything in it wrong?
minus-squarebarrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up41·2 days agoSome of the names are made up, for example the man “Dick Turgidson” is based on was actually called “Penis Hardon” IRL, but even Kubrick thought that was a bit much.
minus-squareMoonElf [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-217 hours agodeleted by creator
was anything in it wrong?
Some of the names are made up, for example the man “Dick Turgidson” is based on was actually called “Penis Hardon” IRL, but even Kubrick thought that was a bit much.
deleted by creator
seems not