• TheDrink [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    “Right now, the number of maneuvers is growing exponentially,” Hugh Lewis, a professor of astronautics at the University of Southampton in the U.K. and a leading expert on the impact of megaconstellations on orbital safety, told Space.com. “It’s been doubling every six months, and the problem with exponential trends is that they get to very large numbers very quickly.”

    Oh boy.

    I’m generally pro space technology, but I hope SpaceX learns the hard way that a constellation like this isn’t physically possible and makes everyone else cancel their planned ones. Best case scenario they create kessler syndrome and ground every spacecraft on Earth until enough debris comes back down (shouldn’t take more than a year at their altitude) and it sparks some kind of international outrage/UN regulation against megaconstellations.

    • AnarchoAnarchist [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      One of my fears is that it creates a race, China’s already working on a large internet constellation themselves. Because if they don’t, they let Elon Musk control internet communication in low Earth orbit.

      It’s the tragedy of the Commons all over again. China probably doesn’t want to spend billions of dollars flooding low earth orbit with internet satellites, but they can’t sit back and let musk and bezos do it unilaterally. I assume they were content with whatever international organizations handed out lower earth orbits, until apartheid baby decided to eat up every space he could

    • Dirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I am also pro space technology, which is exactly why I hate SpaceX.

      A rich morons ego project that is setting space exploration back decades with light pollution and space tourism and on course to cause a Kessler syndrome.

      These people aren’t scientists. They’re the John Hammond’s of space technology.

      “I’ll tell you the problem with the scientific power that you’re using here: it didn’t require any discipline to attain it. You read what others had done and you took the next step. You didn’t earn the knowledge for yourselves, so you don’t take any responsibility for it. You stood on the shoulders of geniuses to accomplish something as fast as you could and before you even knew what you had you patented it and packaged it and slapped it on a plastic lunchbox, and now you’re selling it, you want to sell it!”

    • varmint [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      More than that, I wouldn’t say no to some Kessler syndrome in a higher orbit. We need a few generations to get our shit together down here on Earth

      • TheDrink [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’m not convinced Kessler Syndrome is physically possible in higher orbits - at least not without getting asteroid mining involved. The higher you go the longer it would theoretically last but also the more debris you would need to create it.

    • Ste41th
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      Sorry small correction “wanna be self-driving shitboxes”

        • Ste41th
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yes but kinda no, self driving would mean the owner shouldn’t have to control the car, but with autopilot you have to every so often touch or squeeze the steering wheel