• Alex
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 days ago

      The drop in vote share or squawkbox’s rather hysterical analysis?

        • Alex
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          12 days ago

          Lumping the Tories and Reform together as far right is certainly a choice but whatever. Wild swings are always going to be more likely with individual ward results because the total number is electors is quite small (~1500 votes in this case). There aren’t many details online but it looks like some local scandal combined with low turnout has lead to a collapse of the vote for Labour. Reform didn’t even stand in the previous campaign and it looks like they have split the Tory vote fairly evenly.

          So yes it’s a loss for a ward that was strongly Labour before but it looks driven by local issues and it’s hardly a harbinger referendum on national politics that the article paints it as.

          • FelixCress@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            Lumping the Tories and Reform together as far right is certainly a choice but whatever

            I haven’t noticed much difference since around 2016.

            • frazorth@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 days ago

              Reform will always be a little more far right, because they get to say the racist things the Tories wanted to say, but need the waters tested first.

              Not by much, but always about 3-4 steps in that direction.