• NauticalNoodle
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    What does the privatization of space flight, and it’s subsequent technical failures resulting in a 2-week expedition turning into a 10-month expedition have to do with capitalism? Is that a serious question?

    • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago
      1. So a non-capitalist space program would have no technical issues ever? Sounds about as sound as most communist propaganda logic.
      2. If you actually read the article, they are staying there to continue the science until replacement crew arrives. The capsule is ready and they are able to return any time. There wasn’t another technical failure.
        • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          How many commercial technical failures and logistical failures is adequate for you?

          Maybe fewer or equal than there were with government run NASA? Starliner turned out to be a safe spacecraft that was recalled due to abundance of caution. Which leaders at NASA were far more comfortable doing, since it reflects badly on Boing instead of them (which is a good thing).

          On the other hand, while NASA run the launches itself, how many astronauts died in disasters?

          You are seriously going to pretend one issue is somehow a failure of privatized spaceflight? A nonfatal issue that caused two astronauts to chill on the space station for longer than expected, most of it voluntarily?

          • Halosheep@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Nuance isn’t allowed here on lemmy. You will hate capitalism or you will be silenced. You will hate privatization, or you will be ostracized.