CoolerOpposide [none/use name]@hexbear.net to Slop.@hexbear.netEnglish · edit-22 days agoToday’s curated slop: The comment section of the Civilization 7 announcement that Harriet Tubman will be an in-game leaderhexbear.netimagemessage-square73fedilinkarrow-up193arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up193arrow-down1imageToday’s curated slop: The comment section of the Civilization 7 announcement that Harriet Tubman will be an in-game leaderhexbear.netCoolerOpposide [none/use name]@hexbear.net to Slop.@hexbear.netEnglish · edit-22 days agomessage-square73fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareMindfury [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up39·edit-21 day agoluckily, Civ 7 is kinda doing the Humankind thing and separating the leaders from the civs to some extent meaning, Harriet Tubman doesn’t have to lead the yankoid shitheap afaik
minus-squareCthulhusIntern [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 day agoI know we’re getting into more Paradox than Civ here, but I’d like to see it as, if John Brown or Nat Turner succeed, then she’s the leader of the new America.
minus-squareSulvor [he/him, undecided]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·19 hours agoJohn Brown as a Great General when?
luckily, Civ 7 is kinda doing the Humankind thing and separating the leaders from the civs to some extent
meaning, Harriet Tubman doesn’t have to lead the yankoid shitheap afaik
I know we’re getting into more Paradox than Civ here, but I’d like to see it as, if John Brown or Nat Turner succeed, then she’s the leader of the new America.
John Brown as a Great General when?