• Steal Wool@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Man I’m just trying to get my external speakers to work without blaring static whenever the powersave kicks in, and nobody seems to know what to do 🤷‍♀️

    • SaltyIceteaMaker
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      i don’t see how this is annoying when it is literally posted to a community called “linuxmemes”

    • oshu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Been using linux on my desktop since 1999. Don’t need an official declaration.

    • Monstrosity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Pretty sure the success of Linux will not ride or die on the Charisma stat of its users.

    • EnderMB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s really sad that this needs to be said. I 100% agree with the sentiment. The reason I use Linux is because most of my work requires Linux, but I resisted it for a really long time because communities like these are just incredibly toxic and insufferable. Sometimes looking at this community makes me want to rage-boot Windows and become a C# dev all over again.

    • RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      In this case I actually mainly meant MacOS, which has a relatively big market share. Though for me personally it’s Linux, it applies to all other operating systems, with MacOS being the one large enough that people who use windows can’t ignore it. I’m not a fan of these “here’s what you need to know” titles because it doesn’t add anything, the title would be functionally the same without it. I was making fun of this by saying that I don’t need to know this and thus showing that (this part of) the title is only included to get more clicks

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        I actually mainly meant MacOS

        Maybe I’m just dumb or something, but you’re really burying the lede on this MacOS angle by having your meme say “Me with linux”

  • DiabolicalBird@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    5 days ago

    Regardless of us using Linux on our home computers, most businesses and services use Windows machines. Your information is likely still stored on Windows machines elsewhere if you interact with the world at all.

    With that in mind, it’s worth being aware of Windows security problems when they come up.

  • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 days ago

    Sometimes Mint tells me there are security updates available. Happened just this morning. Updating makes me feel good :)

    • kekmacska@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      most antivirus apps are very invasive, heavy on resources and even spy on you. Windows defender is usually enough. However, virustotal is still recommended

      • DragonsInARoom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Is this something that someone who doesn’t have tech as a hobby cares enough about to change they’re os?

        • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          I would say yes? Many if my friends in uni were using laptops that had McAfee built in. I’m not exaggerating when I say they were unusable. I removed that shit and those machines were snappy af.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      Anti-virus is not going to stop you from stupidity. You classic “Anti-virus” won’t stop anything more than run of the mill simple stuff.

      • DragonsInARoom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        Most of the time that’s what people need an antivirus for, most attacks the average person will suffer will be some script that’s easily caught by the antivirus.

  • Rikj000@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    Bootkitty?

    However,
    you can already patch your BIOS to become secure again! :)

    All in all, Windows security is a joke compared to Linux’s.

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Windows security is… fine? It could be better, but it’s pretty much on par with linux security. Both have their vulns, but they’re both also able to be secured enough that most (if not all) major data breaches are via phishing or other social engineering attacks, not solely software exploits. There’s lots of fodder for the Linux vs. M$ debate, but this one is maybe a bit out of date.

      • DoeJohn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        5 days ago

        If you actually dig deeper into the Linux security topic, you’d find out that Linux is actually not very secure. GrapheneOS developers made quite a lot of posts on what Linux distros (and the kernel) are missing in terms of security. A lot of “Linux security and the lack of viruses” rides on the waves of “there is hardly any point of creating malware for a system with such a small user base, plus you have to consider the fact that people knowledgeable enough just to install a Linux distro would be a bit more careful about their computers than the average Joe”.

        • Ooops@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          there is hardly any point of creating malware for a system with such a small user base

          Actually the whole world runs on linux, Windows is mostly the low level consumer end.

          Which makes your argument true for a certain segment of malware (the cheap low tech stuff more akin to scams etc targeting people en mass but expected to have a low return), but not actually for the parts where the money is that justify elaborate malware and hacks.

          • Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            The internet runs on linux.

            (Webservers, some network equipment, monitoring servers, NAS, DNS, … lots of services can be setup and ran for free on linux. ((Companies like free)))

            • Ooops@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 days ago

              A lot of companies stuff also runs on linux when it’s not free, just so they can avoid having to manage the hardware side… see: Google Cloud, AWS, Azure etc.

              The amount of companies having their whole infrastructure run by one of the big cloud services on linux servers nowadays is far too high to make a serious argument of “linux is only secure because it’s irrelevant and no one cares to break it”.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        I want a Linux system that is entirely rootless by leveraging containers and service accounts.

        Think about it. Instead of having root you could just have a utility that connects to a daemon that is in a sandboxed environment.

    • kekmacska@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      bootkitty wasn’t implemented ever and if you use GUID Partition Table and your bios is set to uefi without csm, it can’t affect you, since Bootkitty embeds itself into the Master Boot Record and there exploits the LogoFail vulrenability (this was already patched btw) with as far as i remember, a self-extracting steganographical bitmap image for arbritary code execution to bypass Secure Boot with injecting face certifications to Moklist. Also, it only runs on select devices, far from all Linux systems are vulrenabe.

  • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    uh, you do know there are exploits in Linux right? Stop pretending that Linux is “virus free”