Bernie Sanders Says Defeating Oligarchy Now Most Urgent Issue | Common Dreams
www.commondreams.org
"My friends, you don’t have to be a PhD in political science to understand that this is not democracy. This is not one person, one vote. This is not all of us coming together to decide our future. This is oligarchy."

Summary

Senator Bernie Sanders is intensifying his fight against U.S. oligarchy, targeting wealthy individuals like Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg.

Sanders argues that these billionaires manipulate the global economy, influence elections, and control the government, hindering democracy and exacerbating global inequality.

He believes this issue is crucial, impacting various aspects of society, including climate change, healthcare, worker protections, and poverty.

      • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
        171·
        1 day ago

        I’m a two-time Bernie for President alum and believe without hesitation that he would have been a transformative president for America and the world.

        Honestly I can only name two things on which Bernie and I disagree, and it’s unsurprising because they are two things on which a lot of people disagree and highly nuanced, and it’s heavy policy wonk differences on gun safety and certain middle east policy. I don’t want to go into them in detail here. They’re both issues on which our views have changed over time.

        • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
          2·
          11 hours ago

          I’m a pretty hardcore lefty: do on-the-ground organizing, contribute some of my time to NGOs, am part of the working group on some causes, etc… Damn near everyone of note in my union knows me by first name.

          So it comes as a real shocker to them that I think gun control as they want to pursue it is deeply misguided. This is not an emotional decision: my stance is informed by statistics, experience, and theory. You can actually have working gun control without banning anything.

        • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          15·
          1 day ago

          What exactly is wrong with that? Wikipedia makes it seem like it just requires sites to moderate user content or face consequences for blatant enabling of sex trafficking specifically:

          They clarify the country’s sex trafficking law to make it illegal to knowingly assist, facilitate, or support sex trafficking, and amend the Section 230 safe harbors of the Communications Decency Act (which make online services immune from civil liability for the actions of their users) to exclude enforcement of federal or state sex trafficking laws from its immunity.

          I feel like the key detail is “knowingly”.

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/FOSTA-SESTA

      • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
        18·
        1 day ago

        I like Bernie as much as the next person but idolizing people and believing they can do no wrong is not helpful

        • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          4·
          1 day ago

          I don’t believe he can do no wrong—I was asking for examples, and the ones I replied to were not totally accurate in my opinion.