RoabeArt [he/him]@hexbear.net to Slop.@hexbear.netEnglish · edit-26 days agoPls don't do Project 2025 😭hexbear.netimagemessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up1138arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up1136arrow-down1imagePls don't do Project 2025 😭hexbear.netRoabeArt [he/him]@hexbear.net to Slop.@hexbear.netEnglish · edit-26 days agomessage-square44fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarefreagle@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·6 days agoI don’t think that’s precedent, is it? Was the court case about murder?
minus-squarePhilosoraptor [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·6 days agoIt was explicitly raised as a hypothetical during the oral arguments at SCOTUS, and Trump’s team argued that it would be covered by immunity as long as the President thought he was genuinely acting in the national best interest.
minus-squaregay_king_prince_charles [she/her, he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·6 days ago Trump’s team Justice Samuel Alito, but same difference
minus-squarePhilosoraptor [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 days agoDefinitely
I don’t think that’s precedent, is it? Was the court case about murder?
It was explicitly raised as a hypothetical during the oral arguments at SCOTUS, and Trump’s team argued that it would be covered by immunity as long as the President thought he was genuinely acting in the national best interest.
Justice Samuel Alito, but same difference
Definitely