• the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    Right? Where does Microsoft get off adding minimum hardware requirements to windows 11 for the first time ever?

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      The laughable part is the hardware list keeps slipping, my 2017 HP workstation said it was not supported due to CPU, now it recently changes to get ready for W11. Like all of a sudden when they see no one is adopting 11 as fast as they want they go and change requirements.

    • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      What I’m picking at is not requiring some min HW to run their adware. It’s how much, compared with the development of their OS. W11 is mostly W10+trash.

      • tekato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        The requirements are 7 year old hardware. While not everyone upgrades their PC every 7 years, I don’t think it’s unreasonable to stop supporting 7 years old hardware. Apple requires iPhone XS (6 years old) for iOS 18, Google requires Pixel 6 (3 years old) for Android 15, MacOS Sequoia requires 6 years old laptops. Turns out Microsoft is the one giving the most support.

        • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          I don’t think it’s unreasonable to stop supporting 7 years old hardware.

          I think that it is; gimme a decade or so then we talk. Specially when feature-wise W11 is basically W10.

          • tekato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            TPM is required for Windows 11 because it is used for security purposes. The world is filled with things that aren’t “technically required” but they are actually required because they help prevent things. The web doesn’t “technically require” HTTPS, but modern websites require an HTTPS connection. A seatbelt isn’t “technically required” to drive a car, but you are required to wear one anyways.

            • JackbyDev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              30 days ago

              This is like a car seat manufacturer refusing to “support” cars without seatbelts and then claiming their new line of seats is secure.

              • tekato@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                30 days ago

                It is not the same. The government won’t even allow you to drive a car without a seatbelt if you somehow managed to buy one. Anyways most cars will provide you support for 5 years. A car is worth tens of thousands of dollars yet you get less support than a computer and nobody is complaining about that. Just like you can use your car with its 10 years old software, you can use your 10 years old computer with your old OS (Windows 10). This is a very simple problem.

                • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  30 days ago

                  It is not the same. The government won’t even allow you to drive a car without a seatbelt if you somehow managed to buy one.

                  Obviously it’s not exactly the same. It’s an analogy. It’s only meant to help illustrate a point.