• Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The fuck you mean “new”? They have been trying to force chromium based browsers on everyone in part for this exact reason

    • Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Brave has plenty of problems and chromium base is only one of them, here’s some easy examples from recent history:

      https://www.androidpolice.com/2020/06/07/brave-browser-caught-adding-its-own-referral-codes-to-some-cryptcurrency-trading-sites/

      The issue came to widespread attention yesterday, when Twitter user @Cryptonator1337 pointed out that Brave Browser auto-filled a referral code to the end of the web address when “binance.us” is typed into the address bar. Binance is a cryptocurrency trading website, and with that referral code, Brave Software could earn 20% from trading fees for every account created using the link.

      https://cryptobriefing.com/basic-attention-token-rebounds-despite-brave-autofill-controversy/

      • Brave browser reportedly redirected its users to the company’s own referral links when navigating to different platforms such as Binance, Coinbase, and others.
      • Following the incident, the price of Basic Attention Token plummeted over 6%.
      • But over the last few hours, the bulls appear to have stepped in, signaling that BAT is poised for further gains.

      Best case scenario Brave is difficult to fully trust, why go out of your way to use a browser that tries to monetize your usage?

      While we’re at it fuck every chromium-based browser. Why help google conquer the internet that much faster? Because that’s how they attack unlock origin and such, that’s how they introduce lag and pauses for people visiting YouTube on non chromium browsers, etc.

  • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    16 hours ago

    This has been coming since they announced Manifest v3. Anyone paying any attention at all knew this was going to happen.

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Imagine using you power to "vote for "/support/give power to a company who says it’s gonna kill all ad-blockers to monopolise the ad market even further … and then complain about the exact thing happening.

    Using Chrome (or other Google products) is just supporting and enabling that.
    If people didn’t use it, none if it would have happened.

    • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      20 hours ago

      There was a time not too long ago where I would have just assumed a move this clearly douchey and against your customers’ desires would lead to nothing but a complete evacuation of those customers, but I’ve seen this movie play out enough times to know that somehow, someway, this will work out just fine for them. People will complain, swallow it whole, keep on using it, and finally just forget about it.

      • umbrella
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        this stumps me, when an alternative can be installed in 2 seconds like every other app

    • Blaster M@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      No permissions, unable to do some advanced blocking stuff, unable to pull an updated list of ad urls (which means you have to update the extension to get updated ad lists), and so on

      • vga@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        (which means you have to update the extension to get updated ad lists)

        Extensions get updated automatically, though, right?

        • AWildMimicAppears@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          yes, but ublock gets its blocklists from an external address, which cannot be done with manifest v3. and updating the extension is something that can take weeks until approved, while google could just outmaneuver ublock.

        • zoostation@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          The change hasn’t even officially happened yet. Over time, following the changes, ad tech will get restructured to take advantage of the new limitations so ads can’t be blocked. Nothing will change overnight.