“Imperialism leaves behind germs of rot which we must clinically detect and uproot from our land but from our minds as well.” - Frantz Fanon

Hello users of Hexbear, the intent of this announcement is two-fold the first is that we would like to do another community moderator drive, if you have a community idea or want to help an existing one then please send an application either through hexbear or matrix direct message.

The call for new mods is crucial to our efforts to reduce racism and misogyny on the site, we need users to report and enough mods to be able to quickly act on the reports throughout the day and night. Also, CW or content warnings are essential to the safe browsing of Hexbear.

In addition, comments or posts removed for racist or misogyny will also be accompanied by escalating temporary bans. Upvotes will not be the single reason for a ban, however they may be used in conjunction with other posts/comments/upvotes. Consider this post the warning, however, mods are encouraged to reach out to hexbear users before a long duration ban.

The second is to increase transparency with regard to the site while not repeating the mistakes of previous attempts that were ultimately counterproductive, in part due to wreckers.

Previous attempts to increase site transparency and user participation were targeted by wreckers through increasing the intensity and frequency of struggle session drama.

Using matrix’s increased level of user permissions as an anti-wrecking measure while having an increased barrier to sending messages with a clear process to gaining the ability to send messages, we hope to mitigate wrecking attempts.

Leading to the creation of the Hexbear Proposals chapo.chat matrix room.

This will be a place for site proposals and discussion before implementation on the site.
Every proposal will also be mirrored into a pinned post on the hexbear community. Any other ideas for helping to integrate the two spaces are welcome to be commented here or messaged to me directly.

Within Hexbear Proposals you can see the history of all site proposals and react to them, indicating a vote for or against a proposal.

Sending messages will be restricted to verified and active hexbear accounts older than 1 month with their matrix id in their hexbear user profile.

All top level messages within the channel must be a Proposals (idea for changing the site), Feedback (regarding non-technical aspects of the site, for technical please use https://hexbear.net/c/feedback), or Appeals (regarding admin/moderator actions).

Discussion regarding these will be within nested threads under the post.

To gain matrix verification, all you need to do is navigate to my hexbear userprofile and click the send a secure private message including your hexbear username.

In closing, I want to state that this site would not exist without the volunteer labor of the moderators, who I am deeply grateful for.

I would also like to take this moment to remind people that lemmy direct messages are not encrypted, and finally please use this post to discuss these changes, share community ideas, or express interest in moderation.

Application

What is your Hexbear username?

Do you have any preferred pronouns?

What are your thoughts on capitalism?

What are your thoughts on imperialism?

What are your thoughts on trans rights?

What are your thoughts on racial justice?

What do think about current and previous protests around the world?

What are your thoughts on Veganism and Animal Liberation?

Do you have any experience with other leftist online communities?

What did those experiences teach you?

What is your approach to moderation, and how do you work with teams?

How do you deal with online drama and people who try to start things for the sake of it?

What current comms would you be interested in moderating?

Do you have any ideas for community engagement?

What is your general time availability? (Time zone, amounts, common browsing times, etc)

Element information

Element is a messaging app that lets you talk to people over the Matrix protocol.

To get started, check out this link, where you can choose to either download Element for your platform or, if on a computer, open it in a browser.

The instructions that follow are for the desktop application and the web application, but the process is similar on all apps:

Press “Create Account”

We host our own Matrix server, so if you want you can change matrix.org to chapo.chat.

This is completely optional; users who sign up with a matrix.org username can still talk to people with chapo.chat username.

(Note: It is chapo.chat, not hexbear.net. Also, registrations aren’t always open on chapo.chat; if they’re not, just create an account on matrix.org)

Fill in a username and password

Hit register, and you’re done!

  • MF_COOM [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    I’ll be honest having my upvotes monitored by secret committee has always made me very uncomfortable and I do not like this as an approach to push the site into whatever the mods want to unilaterally create. I genuinely thought that ended after that giant purge in the first year I didn’t know mods still did that.

    This is not to say I’m against any of the reasons mods want to moderate upbears. I just don’t like feeling like I’m under a microscope even if Ihave nothing to hide. I know it’s not popular to say, but I know I’m not just talking for myself here.

    Traffic has seemed way down since the comm struggle session and I worry mods underestimate the chilling effect that unapologetic, undemocratic, heavy-handed moderation has an an ultimately delicate community.

    • CARCOSA [they/them]@hexbear.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      8 hours ago

      This isn’t a constant thing, the process is someone says: “Hey this really reactionary comment got a lot of upvotes can you check that?”

      A user that shows up on a few of these requests are going to get closer attention, this is what we mean by upvotes are used along with modlog and post/comment history when determining the appropriate mod action to take against someone.

      As per the previous struggle session, we have changed the way that site changes are discussed and enacted to give more transparency/user interaction.

      We still have hundreds of daily active users, more than we had months ago, that being said this site has never prioritized growth or user count. What we have prioritized is making this as protected of a space possible for our marginalized comrades.

      These comrades have asked for the recent changes, and without a doubt I could have communicated better. To that end we seek to improve the transparency process and allow more user engagement with said process

      • MF_COOM [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Thank you for your response. I do think it’s one thing to look into upvotes to check if it’s just new accounts that are upvoting something reactionary, but quite another to be disciplining users in otherwise good standing for an upbear. I think it’s better to just delete the post and accept without policing that some people upvoted it.

        I would add that adding transparency is good, but quite different from a democratic process. For example with this decision to be monitoring people’s voting behavior, in other comments you have been quite transparent about your intention to continue doing so which doesn’t really feel much better than you doing it in private - either way it seems like you have already made up your minds to continue doing it. Being transparent and permitting discussion without any sense that you might ever alter behavior based on user feedback doesn’t feel like much an improvement to me but I guess that’s just me this isn’t a hill I’m interested in dying on.

        this site has never prioritized growth or user count.

        I’d also want to remind you that the mod team is not the site. That may indeed be true for the mod team, but I’ve been here since day one and there are many users on the site who do indeed prioritize growth, myself included. That doesn’t mean I prioritize it above anything else, but I do think this is a good positive community and want to to thrive and at least have a consistent replacement of good comrades as people naturally move on.

        • SadArtemis [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Personal opinion, but I think a lot of people (as well as this site in general) need to expand beyond this site- as in, this would go regardless, no one (not even the mods/etc) should have this as their one source of socializing/human interaction (probably).

          I don’t think I’d say I prioritize growth, but I think it would be nice if this site could be a space from which people could expand outwards and develop their own circles (which if it fit their priorities/preferences, would prioritize growth). Things like the recent webfishing groups, tracha, hexcraft (still need to check it out myself), the movie-watching stuff, etc. all would be such examples. The world is big enough for infinite social circles that harmonize with one another (ideally, realistically this doesn’t always happen but it absolutely can and usually does, people just don’t look at the successes which are a daily part of life for pretty much almost everyone).

          Not entirely sure where I’m going from this, but having a discussion about what Hexbear’s priorities are would probably be a good idea. And then also having a discussion about how to create- if not on Hexbear, adjacent to and maybe mutually benefiting from it- other spaces with other priorities would probably also be cool.

          • MF_COOM [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I think whether the site withers of flourishes is completely orthogonal to the question of having diverse social circles.

            I organize in real life with real people, and I have a rich, diverse and nourishing social circle. That has literally nothing to do with whether it’s good that this site gets more engaged and active users.

            • SadArtemis [she/her]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Agreed, though FWIW flourishing is also a matter of preference. Quality vs. quantity and all that. Not sure if I’d say the site has the best mix of it now or not, but it’s probably better than anywhere else other than Lemmygrad in my opinion, while also having the added benefit of being more active/shitposty/etc than the grad.

              Do we want more engaged and active users if they’re coming from- I dunno, lemm.ee, or lemmy.world, for instance? I don’t think anyone here would want that, or rather there’s a reason we’re all on here. It’s something to be discussed, definitely, but whatever it is will have to be a balancing act of such conflicting interests, sadly.

              • ProletarianDictator [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                4 hours ago

                I dont think Lemmygrad is better. Too slow to be as entertaining, and not enough effort posts to bridge that gap. Engagement matters, but we also don’t have to follow to VC capital oriented norm of fostering engagement.

      • Parzivus [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Are admins able to see how often someone upvotes posts?
        Like, if a user who doesn’t upvote very often has upvoted a lot of banned comments, that might be indicative of their opinions, but someone who upvotes everything isn’t necessarily endorsing those comments.

      • NewAcctWhoDis [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 hours ago

        This isn’t a constant thing, the process is someone says: “Hey this really reactionary comment got a lot of upvotes can you check that?”

        In this case, did a moderator request it? In another comment you said:

        For active hexbear users, we do encourage a mod sending a warning message, however that is not required. We frequently give 1 day temp bans without such a warning and while we do wish we had more mod tools available, we work with what we’ve got.

        but afaik mods can’t see votes, only admins. Did an admin relay this info to a mod? Did a mod request the users be banned and an admin carried it out? Or did an admin initiate this? (Or am I wrong and mods can see votes in their comms?)

        • CARCOSA [they/them]@hexbear.netOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          8 hours ago

          More than one person requested the admin vote audit, both mods and users.

          Only admins can see votes, we are seeing if we can change that setting so all users can.

          For site moderation issues, yes a mod often says “I banned this user from the community and think they need a site action”

          • skeletorsass [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            57 minutes ago

            we are seeing if we can change that setting so all users can

            This would make me feel less safe. Do not think the vote opinion of user should be public. Vulnerable user more unsafe.

          • ProletarianDictator [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Only admins can see votes, we are seeing if we can change that setting so all users can.

            This is a horrible idea. Seems like a perfect util for feds to use to deanonymize users by looking for usage and voting patterns. If this happens, I will probably only use Hexbear while logged out, and I suspect others will too, killing engagement.

            • Alaskaball [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              oh my god, what kind of spambot runs right up to an admin and does its thing.

              edit: I know it’s a bot and can’t really strategize, but I literally watched this live going “hold up what the devil is this? Clicks account to see who/what this is Oh wait it’s already banned lmao owned”