cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/17202407

Sen. Roger Marshall (R-KS) introduced a bill this week to legally erase transgender people, entitled the “Defining Male and Female Act of 2024.” He claimed that the bill will stop what he called the Biden administration’s attempt to “replace biological sex with dangerous radical gender ideology.”

The bill is a long list of terms and definitions, where words like “father” and “girl” are defined with the words “male” and “female.” Those two words are then defined as “an individual who naturally has, had, will have, or would have, but for a congenital anomaly or intentional or unintentional disruption, the reproductive system that at some point produces, transports and utilizes [sperm or eggs for male or female, respectively] for fertilization.”

  • Aermis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I’m referring to nudity and expressing sexuality in front of children. Drag and children. Parades of expression with children involved. Seeing essentially naked men and women and children being encouraged to interact in it.

    • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Good lord, nudity isn’t even a real issue. I regularly swim laps at my local public pool, and the changing room and showers regularly see a mix of children and adults. I don’t see any kids getting their innocence destroyed in the locker room or showers, and we’re all naked in there.

      People only care when it’s trans people wearing clothes. They don’t really care about nudity, they’re trying to create a moral panic about queer people by suggesting that they are a threat to children.

      • Aermis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        You really think I’m talking about locker rooms? And do I need to point out that these have been male/female seperated?

        • Kalysta@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Little kids are regularly brought into opposite gender restrooms because they only have one parent with them, and can’t be left alone. Is that “sexualizing” a kid or does mommy or daddy just have to pee?

          Same with trans people. Why are you republicans so fucking obsessed with genitals? It’s weird.

    • webadict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Nudity is also not inherently sexual. You can be naked for reasons outside of having sex, such as cleaning yourself, using the bathroom, changing outfits, sunbathing, relaxing, etc. None of those are inherently sexual.

      Wearing drag is not sexual either. It’s been a thing for centuries, and that’s just the easily identifiable stuff.

      Wearing kink gear is not inherently sexual, though I can understand that you don’t recognize that because it has connotations. But you can wear it without it being a sexual act.

      “Expressing” sexuality is purposefully vague. Is kissing expressing sexuality? Is holding hands? Children do those. That would be an expression of your sexual orientation. You aren’t really making any sense.