I don’t agree with the gatekeeping of the take from a literal point of view, but rather I think that the sentiment of “It is reactionary to support exploitation and oppression, and it is hypocritical to claim that you oppose it while still continuing to support it” that leaks from it is spot on 100-com fire vegan-liberation-rad

Also, I gotta love how someone posted two separate comments within a minute of each other just to articulate a very short point of this take being “ableist.” That’s 100% indicative of seething.

I also love (this time using this word unironically) that she’s a fellow black vegan communist who is sick of non-vegan leftist bullshit.

    • Angel [any]@hexbear.netOPEnglish
      171·
      4 days ago

      No non-human animal can be vegan because they are not moral agents.

      Cats, however, can survive and thrive on plant-based diets. Yes, really.

      The pooled evidence to date from our study, and from others in this field, indicate that cats fed nutritionally sound vegan diets may be healthier overall, than those fed meat-based diets. Regardless of diet type, diets should always be formulated to be nutritionally complete and balanced, without which adverse clinical signs may eventually be expected to occur.

      I trust that you have good intentions, but this is just opening the door for carnist concern trolling, which we definitely don’t need on a thread like this of all of the things I could post in c/vegan.

      With that in mind, are you vegan?