shderz@sh.itjust.works to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish · 19 hours agoWould you like to donate a dollar?sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square55fedilinkarrow-up1835arrow-down144
arrow-up1791arrow-down1imageWould you like to donate a dollar?sh.itjust.worksshderz@sh.itjust.works to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish · 19 hours agomessage-square55fedilink
minus-squareiAmTheTot@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up107arrow-down4·19 hours agoThe “kick back” is good PR.
minus-squareSerinus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down1·16 hours agoAnd, if it’s a big enough portion of the charity’s funding, influence over the charity. But not tax breaks.
minus-squareEthalis@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up38arrow-down1·19 hours agoAnd decision-makers at that company feeling good about themselves at no cost whatsoever for the company or themselves.
minus-squarethisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down2·18 hours agoexactly its not really charity if you don’t give something up
minus-squarekambusha@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up11·16 hours agoThey really should match all donations.
minus-squareTheLowestStone@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·13 hours agoThe C-level executive should match all donations. Otherwise that’s money that should be going to improving conditions for the workers.
The “kick back” is good PR.
And, if it’s a big enough portion of the charity’s funding, influence over the charity. But not tax breaks.
And decision-makers at that company feeling good about themselves at no cost whatsoever for the company or themselves.
exactly
its not really charity if you don’t give something up
They really should match all donations.
The C-level executive should match all donations. Otherwise that’s money that should be going to improving conditions for the workers.