• TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        At this stage, I hope you’re annoyed. I’m angry as hell, and I have no time for bottom feeders that can’t look up. You should turn your annoyance into anger and fear, because the truth is, everyone should feel that way. Don’t worry though; when fascism fucks up your life, I won’t even bother saying “told you so.”

  • PrimeMinisterKeyes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    It has to start somewhere
    It has to start sometime
    What better place than here?
    What better time than now?

    Lights out
    Guerrilla radio
    Turn that shit up

    • criitz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      The point of the dial is there is no middle ground. You either take it quietly or you’re a troublemaker.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        I don’t mean to diminish the larger point you’re making about feminism not having middle ground, but from an interface design perspective, a dial very much implies a continuum of settings. When there isn’t middle ground, the interface should be a toggle switch instead.

        Of course this is art, not a real device, so obviously a dial is appropriate because it’s a response to being told to “dial down,” not “switch off.”

        (I almost feel like there could’ve been something different about the way the dial was depicted – maybe with a range with “raging feminist” next to “complicit” and something more extreme above it, or maybe indeed using a toggle instead of a dial – in order to emphasize that “raging feminist” already is as “dialed down” as you could reasonably ask for, but such UI realism would probably just clutter up the design without improving the message. As art, I think the artist got it right as-is.)

        • criitz@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          You’re not wrong. But I picture this dial to snap between two settings. Like ones that are used for on/off switches. Not like a continuous potentiometer type.

          • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            It being a dial illustrates that while people who make such statements pretend that there’s a continuum, it’s really rather binary.

        • hope@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          37
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Is that reaction actually increasing the misogyny though? I kinda expect it’s just bringing out into the open what is already there tbh

            • HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              Instead of complaining that feminists speak out, why not call out the actual problem: the misogynists? Be a “staunch advocate” and have the conversations that women can’t.

            • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              38
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              “This rape would be going a lot better for you if you’d just stop struggling so much!”

              • BetaBlake@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Immediately jumping to a rape analogy isn’t fair or apt, you can always make someone else’s argument appear dumb when you jump to an EXTREME

              • Supervivens@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                edit-2
                8 hours ago

                “All men are fucking douchebags and should die” -> “if they already think I’m a douchebag and the other side will be nice to me…”

                Don’t get me wrong, I understand that that’s an extreme but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen either. I’m not saying I agree really with either side and “turning down the feminism” is a kinda weird thing to say to your student but I have heard multiple different times of someone who saw how much they seemed to be hated and drifted to the right as they were accepted there (even if for the wrong reasons).

    • EfreetSK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I fully agree. This applies not only to feminism but in general - if you want to convince people about something, you need to plan your approach, what to say, know what works on people etc. You cannot just rage like crazy because there’s a high chance you just create a counter reaction.

      F.e. I’d say we can all agree that gay rights are the right thing. But if you come to some conservative village, start shouting at everyone, being super aggresive and rage like a maniac, I’d bet that the only thing you achieve is that you’ll be labeled as “that crazy person”

      I’m really surprised of the responses to this comment, I find this to be a common sense

      • Seleni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: “I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action”; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a “more convenient season.”

        Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.

        -Martin Luther King Jr

        Got a lot of the same vibes, really

        • CandleTiger@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Preach on.

          I went to the Women’s Rights National Historical Park in Seneca Falls, NY, and of all the things that really struck me hard there (it was a lot) I think the biggest hit was realizing how fucking long it took between the start of mainstreaming the movement and women actually getting the vote. None of the women who started that movement lived long enough to cast their own vote.

          There was no “women’s black panthers”. There was no threat of violence if women can’t control their own lives. Everybody got to pretty much just stay comfortable with their nice order. And change did. not. happen. For years.

          Maybe the slow pace was worth it, I don’t know. I’m not a woman and I’m not much devoted to order. But it seems pretty clear that “avoid offending anybody” is not an effective tool for change.

        • EfreetSK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Fair enough, good quote (btw I’m not from US so my knoledge here is limited). Although I’m not sure what portion I agree/disagree with it, I have to think about it much more.

          But I mean, even MLK understood that there’s a limit, right? Like he didn’t take AK47 and started to murder all the racists he saw but have chosen rather strong but non violent approach and he thought about what he was saying and what “works”. And that’s all I’m saying, I’ve never said that you cannot take a strong stance. But if you turn it to 11 and just RAGE!!! then be prepared that you might not achieve anything or even make the situation worse

          • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 hours ago

            More MLK quotes!

            Let me say as I’ve always said, and I will always continue to say, that riots are socially destructive and self-defeating. I’m still convinced that nonviolence is the most potent weapon available to oppressed people in their struggle for freedom and justice. I feel that violence will only create more social problems than they will solve. That in a real sense it is impracticable for the Negro to even think of mounting a violent revolution in the United States. So I will continue to condemn riots, and continue to say to my brothers and sisters that this is not the way. And continue to affirm that there is another way.

            But at the same time, it is as necessary for me to be as vigorous in condemning the conditions which cause persons to feel that they must engage in riotous activities as it is for me to condemn riots. I think America must see that riots do not develop out of thin air. Certain conditions continue to exist in our society which must be condemned as vigorously as we condemn riots. But in the final analysis, a riot is the language of the unheard. And what is it that America has failed to hear? It has failed to hear that the plight of the Negro poor has worsened over the last few years. It has failed to hear that the promises of freedom and justice have not been met. And it has failed to hear that large segments of white society are more concerned about tranquility and the status quo than about justice, equality, and humanity. And so in a real sense our nation’s summers of riots are caused by our nation’s winters of delay. And as long as America postpones justice, we stand in the position of having these recurrences of violence and riots over and over again. Social justice and progress are the absolute guarantors of riot prevention.

            -The Other America

            And this was over The Long, Hot Summer of 1967 where neighborhoods literally got burned to the ground in riots and dozens of people were killed. Shooting your mouth off in response to someone being a bigot is a piddling offense by comparison.

            Like, I’m not going to stand here and tell you it’s being on your best behavior. But neither is saying some bigoted shit to someone that causes them to pop off in return. Two people can be doing wrong things, and one can even be more at fault!

          • Seleni@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            MLK didn’t; Malcom X did. MLK’s underlying message was ‘acknowledge my peaceful protest, or you get stuck with his less peaceful protest’. Peaceful protesting alone tends to get you a whole lot of nothing.

            Edit: of course, most history classes seem to forget Malcom X even existed, because the ‘just peacefully protest over in that corner and don’t bother us, it will totally make us change our ways’ narrative is much more desirable for certain demographics.

              • Seleni@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Good for you. History disagrees with your disagreeing.

                Look up Malcom X, the Black Panthers, and the Battle of Blair Mountain sometime. Pretty much every victory oppressed groups have won has had to draw blood in order to win the day.

      • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I’m really surprised of the responses to this comment, I find this to be a common sense

        The closer a person and the people they care about get to the chopping block the less common sense it seems.