• zefiax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Ok? And? They aren’t a charity and don’t owe you free video hosting services.

    EDIT: I find it hilarious that point out the fact that you aren’t entitled to free hosting services is getting down voted. Lmao how old are the people here?

    • Gork
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Dude they sell our data to advertisers and big data for profit. The least they can do is provide some services for us for the amount of analytics they collect from us on a daily basis.

      • Dale'sDeadBug@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Dude, they ARE the advertiser. That’s Google’s main business. They have no incentive to export ANY of your account data to 3rd parties. Business tell them what groups of people to advertise to, and their systems handle the rest. They’re open about how it all works.

      • zefiax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        As someone who’s actually worked in this industry, your data isn’t enough to pay for video hosting services to the scale youtube provides. Youtube makes up a significant chunk of all network traffic in the world. It costs money.

          • zefiax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            No i am not. But I am happy to support actual content creators and the platform that they host on and gets them the most views because I spend more time on YT than I do on any other streaming platform.

            • PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              But I am happy to support actual content creators and the platform that they host on and gets them the most views

              It’s too bad youtube doesn’t do that, lol.

              • Shrek@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                They pay content creators more than any other platform to my understanding. I think the exception is kik (kick?) The streaming platform.

                • xts@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Too bad you constantly have to be worried about dumb policy changes that can affect your older videos which can mean cutting off those revenue sources

                  Also I’ve never seen another platform that demonetizes content as much as YouTube does.

                  • Shrek@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Both very fair points. But, there is no other platform that even compares for real.

    • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      And I don’t owe them a subscription if I don’t agree with the value they’ve placed on it. Free market, baby. 👍

        • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          You seem oddly offended at the idea people wouldn’t lol. I don’t know why you’re taking this so personally.

          • zefiax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            No I just think it’s stupid to call people who would pay for a service a corporate shill. I have no issue with someone who doesn’t think a subscription is worth it. Maybe read the whole thread first next time.

    • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They were already being paid and profitable, both from direct cash and ad revenue, but that doesn’t ever seem to be enough.

      • zefiax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        You are free to disagree with their pricing and cancel a subscription if you have one. That’s how the free market works.

        • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Free market works” is by itself a very questionable statement.

          But there sure are some more options beyond that. Although some people think we shouldn’t be free to pick them.

          • zefiax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            You are free to pick w.e you want. That doesn’t make someone actually paying for a decent platform a corporate shill.

            • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Our definitions of “decent” are definitely different. But this is not just about what you choose to do, it’s about all the fingerwagging people do at people who don’t believe this is worth paying (even more) for.

              • zefiax@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                The only finger wagging going on is people calling people corporate shills for actually paying for a service.

                • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Then you need to look better because you are down a thread pointing out how people are getting downvoted and ragged on for suggesting ad blocking options.

                  I find it hilarious that point out the fact that you aren’t entitled to free hosting services is getting down voted.

                  Actually nevermind. Just look at the mirror. You really are talking of Google like it’s a struggling charity.

                  • zefiax@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Then you need to look better because you are down a thread pointing out how people are getting downvoted and ragged on for suggesting ad blocking options.

                    No I am a thread calling people corporate shills for disagreeing with people saying we should all be pirating.

                    Actually nevermind. Just look at the mirror. You really are talking of Google like it’s a struggling charity.

                    It doesn’t matter how rich google is, it doesn’t owe you video hosting services. It’s not a charity. You can disagree with their pricing and you can find another platform if you like. But services cost money and just because a company has money through other sources doesn’t mean they need to subsidize all their products.

                • Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Would just like to interject; while I agree with what you’re saying, and yes, lots of people think an amazing service should be free, which is wrong… But YouTube/Google is now 100% beholden to their shareholders, and this, plus the last couple of price rises, is gouging to make some millionaires richer and is fucking despicable

                  • zefiax@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    That’s for consumers to decide. If people still pay for it and think it’s worth their money, then they aren’t really gouging, they were just under priced. If people don’t and start cancelling their subscriptions, they have over priced it and now need to bring the price back down. For me personally, Netflix is the one teetering on that point, YT isn’t there yet.

    • mrmanager@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      No but I’m not going to pay Google for anything. It’s obscene to give them even more money.

      • zefiax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Whether you think that service is worth it or not is up to you.

        But don’t act like you have some moral high ground here and that people who are actually paying for a service that you are stealing from and a service that actually shares revenue with it’s content creators and encourages independent creators are just corporate shills.

        Some of us are adults and realize things cost money and not entitled children that expect everything for free.

        • dezmd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          And some of us are adults that don’t have your innate need to wield your moral high ground like a smug pedantic asshole.

          • zefiax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I am not the one calling anyone who isn’t pirating a corporate shill.

            • dezmd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              And yet that’s obivously not what this thread’s context was before you started self-jerking to moral superiority.

              Have some self awareness.

              This isn’t a Wendys Drive Thru.

              • zefiax@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Here, since you have difficulty following, let me copy where the original thread started.

                The amount of downvotes on comments trying to help people not get price gouged and comments supporting these subscription price increases shows me just how many corporate shills are actually out there. No wonder these corps keep getting away with this bullshit.

                I am not the one who started the moral superiority, I just disagreed at being called a “corporate shill” before a bunch of insecure assholes started losing their shit.

                Maybe try having self awareness yourself before suggesting it to someone else.

                • dezmd@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Self inserting as a main character to claim you’ve been attacked so you can shill your moral superiority is the cherry on top of your bullshit sundae.