Summary

Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) warned Republicans against opposing Donald Trump’s nomination of Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) as attorney general, stating that MAGA supporters would target their jobs if they break ranks.

Tuberville defended Trump’s right to choose his team, urging senators to “vote with President Trump.”

Gaetz, who recently resigned from Congress, is a divisive figure within the GOP, having faced FBI and House Ethics investigations over alleged misconduct.

Some Republicans are openly concerned about the nomination and are deliberating their next steps.

  • frostprophet@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 minutes ago

    They’re really covering for him here with “alleged misconduct” rather than “alleged rape of a minor”

  • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Yeah I’m sure senators will respond well to threats — as well as some house members did to threats from Gym Jordan to make him Speaker.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      50 minutes ago

      Yes, but not in the way Sen McChucklefuck thinks. Senators are a famously ornery bunch. They’re not going to respond well to threats.

  • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    And this is why they will fall in line. Tuberville’s threat is very, very real.

    Trump has long shown his power to make or break political careers in the GOP. No prominent member of the GOP has so much as criticized Trump and had their political careers remain intact. Liz Cheney is a prime example. Mitch fucking McConnell, who spent decades shaping the far right of the GOP and spent the past 10 years leading Trump’s rise to power in the first place, is now being ostracized by some in his own party for not being MAGA enough. Adam Kinzinger, a former harsh critic of Trump, is now apparently trying to revive his political career by following the Kevin McCarthy playbook of sucking up to Trump..

    They have both trifectas. They’ve got the White House/Congress/Supreme Court trifecta, along with the White House/HOR/Senate. It’s their game. They get to play the game by their rules. And Trump has said that they’re basically going to play Calvinball with the rules to get what they want. They have 53 seats in the Senate. If 51 of them decide that a simple majority can remove a member because they fucking say so, then that’s the rule and there’s nothing you or I can do about it.

    This is the 2nd Trump administration. Get on board or get run over. Trump has far, FAR more power and influence than he had during his first adminstration. Get in his way and you will be purged. It’s that simple.

    And remember, all you people all over the other threads removed and saying you couldn’t vote for Harris because Liz Cheney showed up with her that one time…remember that you fucking voted for this.

    • recapitated@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      41 minutes ago

      On the Harris🤎Cheney issue, I think it’s notable that the Harris turnout was actually quite large in many places, but the trump turnout was larger.

      I can’t remember what media I was doomfully consuming, but someone basically said Dems should not try to court Republicans to vote… because even if it works, they’ll arrive at the polls and vote Republican.

      • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 minutes ago

        I can’t remember what media I was doomfully consuming, but someone basically said Dems should not try to court Republicans to vote… because even if it works, they’ll arrive at the polls and vote Republican.

        Now this is an interesting take on it that at least makes some more sense. I don’t think we have any precedent to really go on; how many times do we really see someone from one party advocating for the other guy. It would be interesting to study how valid it actually is.

    • recapitated@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      44 minutes ago

      I’m not aligned with Kinzinger but I don’t really see the kissass vibes. I think he remains as principled as ever but he is acknowledging the new conditions of the game.

    • NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 hours ago

      This is the 2nd Trump administration. Get on board or get run over. Trump has *far, FAR* more power and influence than he had during his first adminstration.

      Hoping you’re wrong and his mandate fades quickly and he becomes an ineffective lame duck as early into this upcoming term as possible.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      then that’s the rule and there’s nothing you or I can do about it.

      That is NOT true!

      There’s nothing legal we can do about it, but that not the same thing.

      • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Of course, you can always try to go the extralegal route, but you need a hell of a lot of heavily armed people willing to actually do that. Problem with that is that a good chunk of said people just got finished saying “Meh, nah.”

        • Billiam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Problem with that is that a good chunk of said people just got finished saying “Meh, nah.”

          “BUT OnLy 3 PERCeNt oF The coUnTrY FOugHt aGainSt tHE BRiTisH!”

    • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Nothing in that hill article involves sucking up to trump.

      He says Rubio’s not the worst pick. Which is true.

  • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    GOP Senators: Sorry, I won’t get to represent you this term. Thanks for the votes though, and the 6-figure salary and sweet benefits package. Byeeee!

    • stringere@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 hours ago

      And lifetime pension regardless of time served.

      The pension value can be up to 80% of the member’s final salary, which is $174,000 per year. At an 80% rate, that’s a pension benefit of $139,200. (The Speaker of the House has a salary of $223,500. The Senate President makes $193,400, as do the majority and minority leaders in the House and Senate.) All benefits are taxpayer-funded.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        I don’t think that’s a necessarily bad thing. You don’t want to pay politicians less money, when there is very little for anyone not rich or corrupt to run as it is.

        In fact… I think we should raise all of their salaries to $200k a year, and implement a $10 national minimum wage. Each congress members salary is a multiple of 20 of the minimum wage in their state. So let’s say your state has a $15 minimum wage, congratulations you make $250,000 rather than the base.

        • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          The salary is fine but not only is “insider trading” allowed but there’s no divestment or blind trust requirement. Some politicians are “more equal” than others because they’re already millionaires. The whole lawmaker thing is a side-gig.

          • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            Right… that’s why there should be a high salary and good pension for running, getting elected and serving. If you can run once and technically retire decently, it would incentivize normal people to run. Hopefully once you have enough regular folk you can ban insider trading.

            But even as it is, insider trading only really helps the people with money already. What am I gonna take the pittance I have in the bank and invest it? I would only be slightly less poor, even with some amazing trades.

        • olympicyes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The tradition of giving pensions (at least for the president) started under Eisenhower. Everyone took one so Truman wouldn’t be humiliated because he was one of the few who entered office without prior wealth.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 hours ago

      qon-addled magabrainz: “OMG! Hillary is sex trafficking children out of the basement of a pizza parlor with no basement, YOU GUYZZZ!”

      { Actual sex trafficker gets nominated for AG }

      Also qon-addled magabrainz: “If anyone questions this pedo being AG, we will END YOU!”

  • BigBenis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Whether you like it or not, you can’t say members of the Republican party are not beholden to their voters. Can’t say as much for the Democrats, which is why they keep losing.

    • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      That’s bullshit. They are beholden to Russia. They don’t give one fuck about any of their voters.

      We are witnessing a Russian attack on our democracy. They are using Americans against us. These people are the enemies within.

      • BigBenis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Is that not in tandem with Trump voters’ shift to Russia? “I’d rather be Russian than a Democrat” and Trump voters talking about plans to immigrate to Russia if Trump lost are things I seem to remember in recent years.

        My original point was not to claim that Republican politicians necessarily care about what their base wants, but they do seem to understand that they have to at least campaign heavily on populist issues to get elected. And that disloyalty to Trump is met with rabid outrage from their base.

      • peppers_ghost
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Is it so hard to believe Republicans are just shitty people? Why do you need the idea of a puppet master controlling them?

    • fluxion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They voted for better economy and we’re dicking around making Gaetz AG. No, this is not for “the voters” it’s to waste tax dollars persecuting Trump’s political opponents

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Its about time someone ended Tommy’s career. I can’t believe his own actions haven’t. Dude is just a grade A cunt

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Sen. Tommy Tuberville must be aware that the next time anyone is going to vote on any US Senators is (hopefully) in 2026, right?

  • Heikki@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    What can he really do. Not play them in “the big game”? GTFO of here you sack of Florida shit

    • Aphelion@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 hours ago

      He’s from Alabama, and Trump has a 52 seat Repilican held senate with a majority enough to expel anyone who’s not in favor with the GröpenFührer.