- cross-posted to:
- programmer_humor@programming.dev
- tifu@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- programmer_humor@programming.dev
- tifu@lemmy.world
You must log in or # to comment.
I hate that schools basically teach students to over use classes for everything especially by using Java as a teaching language and then they get into the real world or grad school and we have to unteach them those terrible habits.
I’m so glad a lot of the newer languages (Rust, Go, Zig, C3, V) don’t have classes in them at all.
I’m currently taking the very last CS class my major requires. I can’t wait to leave OOP behind and focus on hardware completely.
You did the right thing. OOP was invented by people who were worried about their job security, to obstruct others from understanding their code.
OOP is pretty readable though. What would be the alternative, functional programming with no ORM?
Right, most things are a fine thing in moderation.
Obfuscation Oriented Programming as I call it
Strings are Objects, Doubles are Objects (that are than unboxed into primutives doubles)…
Good, OOP can suck my balls
Balls.suck() is the correct syntax.
Don’t you need to declare new Balls() first? Or do you suck() Balls static?
BallsFactory ballsFactory = new BallsFactory(); ballsFactory.setSuckable(true); Balls balls = ballsFatctory.create();Or I didn’t using the correct naming convention!
