• sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        While this is true for boomers and genx as they saw this life style as a status symbol so they fed the beast… majority of modern housing stock has HoA attache to it, so unless you are looking for mass homlessness. HoA is the herpes we inherited. Now, since we at least can agree it is a cancer, these corruption rackets need to be either 1) reformed, where they are required; or 2) otherwise outright dismantled.

        This is another generation fight though… and even some younger clowns will larp HoA because “it keep me property price hi, I am an owner all i care about is asset appreciation”

        sure thing buddy, living in a house with rapidly increasing tax assessment surely makes you part of the owner class 🤡

        • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I wish the taxes would go up. Here in California there is absolutely no downside to treating your home as an investment vehicle. At least individually.

          • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            I am not following, CA has high property values and and rates unless you got the rate value frozen by some clown law.

            • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Yes, there is a clown law known as Prop 13. Property taxes are extremely low and can’t be raised except by a supermajority of voters… We do have high income taxes but overall it’s actually a middle-tax state.

              Residential property values in CA are only reassessed when the property is sold. So if you’re sitting there for decades in the same house you’ll pay almost no taxes.

              Almost every problem you’ve heard of about California can in some way be linked back to this law.

  • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    Shouldn’t it be more important to reduce the amount of water usage to as little as possible? Southern California is all dessert and is constantly in a draught.

    • hobovision@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Residential water use (especially in cities) is a very small portion. Entire cities use less water than some farms. The problem with water in Southern California is Imperial Valley.

  • speedingcheese@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    The last photo in the article has some greens growing right next to the street. What do you all think of that? Any worries about pollution?

  • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Urban gardening in the news: wow so healthy so easy!

    Urban gardening in reality: the squirrels ate all the fruits, the rats bit the buds off of everything, I just wasted so much water and money to increase the vermin population and have no food to show for it.