• oce 🐆@jlai.luOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yes, I think you’re not getting the point, it’s about making the default for bikes and pedestrians now, and treating cars as secondary users, that have their smaller delimited special lane.

    • GissaMittJobb
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Could be something lost in translation, or I’m just usually dense today.

      Anyway, is this person saying this as a negative? Because I think it’s definitely a positive.

      • oce 🐆@jlai.luOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        He’s supporting this change, he’s part of the local government developing it. So he’s saying that to illustrate the change of mindset.

          • Tobberone@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            As I get it, it’s about shifting the perspective from everything is for cars and pedestrians are an after thought to something like everything is for pedestrians except this particular piece of road where cars may drive. From “car first”, to “pedestrian first”.