• rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    That would in long term be good. I’m serious. Keeping all your eggs in one basket is bad, and other than that - said one basket may, for example, not scale production fast enough so to keep profits, that’s basic supply and demand and that’s what oil producers do too.

    Short term, though, would be similar to a collapse of civilization.

    • nexusband@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Short term, though, would be similar to a collapse of civilization.

      Would it? Civilization doesn’t depend on bleeding edge high tech. Sure, it depends on tech, but look around who’s making ICs or basic processors that are in machine control panels and all the millions of appliances. AMD, Intel, Qualcomm, Broadcom do the “heavy lifting” in terms of monetary value, but in overall quantity? Samsung, SK Hynix, STMicroelectronics, Infineon, Sony, Renesas and NXP are the ones that make the world go round. Infineon is German, NXP is Dutch, Renesas is Japanese, STMicroelectronics is Swiss. The thing that’s really going to hurt is Foxconn, but they are probably global enough to withstand that. There’s also many, many more local players. BOSCH for example has very high capacities for everything up to 80 Nanometers (Pentium 3/4, Athlon 64…)

      Civilization would crack, sure - but i don’t think it would collapse. Society on the other hand…that’s a different paper.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Society on the other hand…that’s a different paper.

        I meant that too. But would actually be interesting, if electronics around us would still be a normal thing, but smartphones changing every year and carelessly used computing power will not. I think it would feel like waking up from a fever dream.

        • nexusband@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I mean, “change” per se isn’t necessarily something bad. Meaning, stuff needs to last longer (again) in those cases. Planned Obsolescence is a real thing, that’s however only economical as long as raw materials are relatively cheap. But it would be nice if companies just did that change, instead of being forced in to it…

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            The issue is - tariffs and regulations already exist and force them the other way in fact. So the matter of purity doesn’t suffer here. Relatively.