• dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    An alternative title is “Newsom declares candidacy for US President in 2028 election”. He is certainly casting himself as the heel in the kayfabe that will be US politics in the next four years.

    Edited to add: He is term limited, and his term runs out in 2026. So he will have nothing better to do.

    • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      17 days ago

      Please no, he’s just another limousine liberal, up there with Hillary and the gang. I think people are done with that. Let’s get some real revolutionaries in there.

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        I’ll vote for the actual limousine if it has a chance of beating the next MAGA candidate, whether it’s Vance, Trump Jr, or Donald Trump with a fake mustache that fools no one but his voters. (And as long as that limousine wins a contested primary.)

        • MysticKetchup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          That’s the issue with the hard right candidates, people keep settling for Republican-lite Dems that don’t address core economic problems because they’re left in comparison, then predictably they lose to far right politicians when their moderate reforms don’t do anything other than provide temporary relief. We need actual left politicians to institute radical structural changes if we ever want to break this cycle. Or a revolution, but given the way this country is going I have no faith that the victors in that would be on the left

      • morrowind
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        17 days ago

        Let’s get some real revolutionaries in there.

        Do you want republicans to win the next election too?

        • Allonzee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          If there’s another legitimate election, you want to double down on neoliberalism and trying to meet fascist in the middle yet again?

          If we can’t elect a revolutionary, then it’s all over anyway until collapse, Trump is a symptom of the crony capitalist greed disease that’s infected both parties. It’s a shame we can’t even agree that our economy’s structure and incentives are the problem and requires drastic change, because without addressing that, nothing can begin to improve. It is the bloodsucking vampire elephant in the room.

    • seaQueue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      No, please no. Newsom is a textbook greasy CA neoliberal, a Newsom presidency would do next to nothing for the working class and bring a load of benefits to the wealthy.

      I generally support his policies on education, environmental protection and long term economic stability but his positions on housing, single payer healthcare, corruption and democratic representation are awful.

      So far he’s: vetoed a statewide upzoning bill that would get dense housing built statewide near public transit corridors, vetoed ranked preference voting across CA, opposed single payer healthcare and let the CPUC ride roughshod over utility customers and saddle them with PG&E’s felonious wildfire liability. The dude is Grey Davis’s protege and was basically raised by the Getty family, he’s absolutely not the candidate to run in a tight economy where populism is surging.

      Edit: fun fact, we called him Teflon Gavin when he ran San Francisco. Nothing sticks to this guy’s PR. Fox news consumers have had 10+y of “commie California’s Gavin Newsom” poured into their heads in preparation for his eventual Whitehouse run and that will matter when he presents his slick well-fed wealthy self to middle America.

      • ericatty
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        17 days ago

        You left out that he was married to Kimberly Guilfoyle

        • seaQueue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          Oh yeah, and after that he had the church of scientology throwing a parade of women at him to see if one would stick.

          He’s the textbook old money nepobaby and while I have no qualms about his competence (they prepared him for big money politics extremely well) I don’t think he’s the change the working class wants to see in America. He certainly hasn’t brought much change to CA outside of funding primary education. We haven’t even begun to tackle living conditions for the bottom 80% here, he’s just a less bad option than whatever unpopular Republican ends up running against him. All of the social reform that actually works (boosting minimum wage, providing single payer healthcare, running cooperative local utilities or tackling corruption) is happening at the city and county level or as a ballot proposition. There’s resistance from Sacramento when anyone brings these up as statewide policies.

    • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      I dont want him to run. I’m tired of seeing neoliberal-lite candidates running and being forces to hold my nose “bcz the other candidate is worse.”

      We can and should do better than this guy.