• phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    She was on a rocketship trajectory before getting Cheney on and focusing on old ex-R endorsements. There aren’t enough voters in the center and you can’t switch any magats is the takeaway.

    • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      11 hours ago

      She was on a rocketship trajectory before getting Cheney

      That’s what we thought but apparently not. All this time a large chunk of Americans were getting brainwashed by social media algorithms that she’s going to start WW3, or going to let all the illegal immigrants in, or she is going to make gas even more expensive, or round up Christians or some other bullshit.

      The DNC didn’t have a chance because the voters are fucking morons.

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        and you’re never going to be able to stop that, so you need to give the left who stayed home (as fucking stupid as that was) someone to be excited about

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I wonder if liberals have finally stopped calling anyone who criticizes Harris and the DNC campaign a MAGA troll.

        • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          You think there are millions of self-proclaimed leftists in USA? Sure buddy.

          And these ‘leftists’ saw who might be president and they still chose to abstain?

          Good job. 👍

          • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            The DNC saw who their rival is and decided to move in that direction instead of catering to the millions that are not voting because of their lacklustre policies. Good job the DNC as well, then.

            What about the ones who are voting but doesn’t use their voice to pressure the DNC to adopt more progressive policies, but instead prefer to alienate the left even more by attacking them the whole way up to the election. I’m sure they’re happy with their decision, as well.

            • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I think my sarcasm wasn’t clear to you so let me say it in clearer terms:

              The left in USA is a myth. There aren’t millions of leftists waiting for DNC to do the right things and give them perfect unicorn to vote for so they can get off their asses.

              • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 minutes ago

                That’s because you can only think in black and white terms that you can’t tell that it’s not just ‘leftist’ that would be motivated to vote if the DNC had catered to more progressive policies, but a lot of people on the centre that had also been disillusioned by the political system. We’ve seen many times that progressive stances gets a lot of support from people of all political spectrum, yet the only thing the DNC can think to do is try to appeal to the right side of the spectrum that would still only vote for a Republican? So ridiculous.

                In the meantime, you can continue putting your head in the sand and enjoy watching Harris get less support than Hillary because the ‘leftist’ are not worth listening to. I’m sure you think if she had slid even more to the right, she would’ve gotten more support, right?

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      There are literally shit tons of voters in the center, that is the big fat juicy center that decides elections. Plus those voters are worth double, because it’s a vote for you and a vote taken away from the other party.

        • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          20 minutes ago

          Kamala didn’t appeal to them. Clinton was right: “It’s the economy stupid”. That’s what got Trump in. Trump won on inflation, housing, and (further right) xenophobia.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Dems lose when they try to appease this magical center because it takes the wind out of the sails of of their voting base. I mean getting buddy buddy with Liz Cheney killed my enthusiasm entirely and I only showed up to vote against Republicans instead of wanting to vote.

        Dems win when they promote hope and energize voters to increase voting turnout. She squandered that momentum.

        • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          19 minutes ago

          Go through history: After successive losses Bill Clinton went center on the economy, as you do against an incumbent, and won. Gore when left with climate change and lost. Obama relied on “hope” and won after Bush’s disastrous wars. Hillary said she’d have a map room to fight climate change and lost. Biden went center, as you do against an incumbent, and won. Kamala tried to copy Obama’s “hope” and energy, but it didn’t work because “it’s the economy, stupid”. *She didn’t run to the left on policy (because she saw that didn’t help Biden after he passed all those left things) but she still relied on the left to show up for their human fucking rights. They couldn’t even do that.

          Every time the Dems lose it’s because they relied on the left that didn’t show up, and the Dems only win when they go center.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 hours ago

            You’re trying to pretend that Harris ran to the left because you still think it’s the fucking 90s.

            • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 minutes ago

              What are you smoking? I literally just said: Kamala tried to copy Obama’s “hope” and energy, but [it didn’t work because] “it’s the economy, stupid”. She didn’t run to the left on policy (because she saw that didn’t help Biden after he passed all those left things) but she still relied on the left to show up for their human fucking rights and mfing democracy. They couldn’t even do that.

              Oh I remember you, you’re the guy that never makes any sense.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            9 hours ago

            That’s… interesting… I don’t know about Bill Clinton, not too familiar with that part of American history, but Gore? Gore won but didn’t demand a recount of Florida. Obama relied on leftist policies and wiped the floor with the GOP. Hillary lost because she was a “hold your nose and vote for her” centrist, not because she relied on leftists what the fuck are you even talking about? Harris did the same thing as Hillary and predictably lost.

            • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              42 minutes ago

              Obama stayed vague and relied on hope and energy. It was enough after Bush’s disastrous wars.

              More on Obama: So he enacted the ACA. That’s great, right? The thanks Obama got for that was to lose the House of Representatives for year 3 and 4. And lose the House of reps again for years 5 and 6. And then lose both the House of reps and the Senate for years 7 and 8. He enacted left policy and: The left never showed up.

              Hillary Clinton: So what did Hillary learn from the last 6 years of Obama? She learned that the left never shows up. So she only stuck her head out with a big position to left on the map room to climate change. She basically declared war on climate change. You know that big existential issue that all the leftists care about, right? The big important issue that the left says they want so badly, right? And guess what happened? Bam she lost. Thanks protest non-voters! Aka: The left never shows up.

              Harris quite literally tried to copy Obama’s hope and energy strategy. She literally hired Obama’s campaign strategists. But it didn’t work because “it’s the economy stupid”.

            • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              7 hours ago

              and even the biden win was just stupidly close given trump literally drove your whole country head first into the top “fucked up the pandemic” spot

          • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            Every time they lost it’s because they relied on the left that didn’t show up

            The left DOES show up…but here’s the thing…there’s not enough of them to make a difference. I know it FEELS like leftism and even progressivism is super duper popular because its omnipresent on the internet but in the real world there just aren’t enough of them to matter for national elections outside of a few specific places.

            It’s like relying on an 8 year old to help you move furniture. You quickly realize that they just aren’t strong enough to do much.

      • sundray@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 hours ago

        This is true, and those voters main concern in presidential elections is the economy. According to NBC’s exit polling:

        Nearly half — 45% — of all voters said they were worse off financially than they were four years ago. That was a higher level of dissatisfaction than what registered in exit polls in any recent election going back to 2008, when the election took place amid the financial crisis that propelled Barack Obama to victory.

        Though the economy is growing […] 2 in 3 voters rated the U.S. economy poorly, a level higher than in 2020, when the country struggled to get in gear during the Covid pandemic.

        […] About three-quarters of voters nationwide said they felt negatively about the way things are going in the country, including 29% who said they were downright angry.

        Meanwhile only 4% of voters cited foreign policy (which covers the Gaza genocide and Ukraine’s defense – immigration was broken out into a separate category) as their main concern. Even if Harris flipped the big red “stop the genocide” button and brought those single issue voters out of hiding, there’s no way they could outnumber the voters who were pissed about the economy.

        Frankly, if she was going to have a real chance, she needed to throw Biden under the bus – and it still might not have made a difference.