Disclaimer: I wrote this article and made this website.

There was some talk of this issue in the recent fediverse inefficiencies thread. I’m hopeful that in the future we’ll have a decentralized solution for file hosting but for now I deeply believe that users should pay for their own file hosting.

  • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    16 days ago

    If a social network is to take off, it must be accessible from mobile devices behind CGNAT (carrier grade network address translation).

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        16 days ago

        Because that’s where all the users are. The “social” aspect of a “social” network. Anyone can host a forum but it’s useless without users.

    • 56!
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      p2p from behind a CGNAT works just fine as long as a single server is accessible and can mediate connections between other peers. Most non-servers are behind some sort of NAT these days.