Why you hatin’ on tertiary and quaternary characteristics?
Body hair growth is triggered by hormonal changes, so body hair could be considered a sexual maturity adjacent characteristic.
Do you also consider a woman’s preference for non-hairy guys to be an abnormal fetish?
What about butts? They’re not (biologically) sexual organs, any more than mouths are; do you consider the admiration of butts to be a fetish?
Why do you include breasts (I assume these are your secondary organs?) as in the “not a fetish” list? They have nothing to do with the passing of gametes; they’re only valuable long after the sex act.
I am going to reuse the fuck out of this, thank you
Counterpoint: Liking a woman’s body the way it naturally is shouldn’t be considered a fetish.
Hmm, so you don’t count “foot fetishes” for instance?
I’d call it a fetish if you are more attracted to feet than primary or secondary sexual organs.
Why you hatin’ on tertiary and quaternary characteristics?
Body hair growth is triggered by hormonal changes, so body hair could be considered a sexual maturity adjacent characteristic.
Do you also consider a woman’s preference for non-hairy guys to be an abnormal fetish?
What about butts? They’re not (biologically) sexual organs, any more than mouths are; do you consider the admiration of butts to be a fetish?
Why do you include breasts (I assume these are your secondary organs?) as in the “not a fetish” list? They have nothing to do with the passing of gametes; they’re only valuable long after the sex act.
Your taxonomy seems rather arbitrary.
Dude, none of your arguments are relevant, we were talking about feet.
It’s Marston’s Wonder Woman bondage all the way down