• ladfrombrad 🇬🇧@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    12 days ago

    I’ve had no end of trouble with routers and ones you should choose to be sure of.

    The ones where you can flash OpenWRT seems the only choice if you want some semblance of security. But even my current Xiaomi router with stock firmware creates hash mismatches using apt to download things, and I don’t 100% know with confidence that using OpenWRT on it instead is keeping me right.

      • ladfrombrad 🇬🇧@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 days ago

        As opposed to, TP-Link, Cisco(Linksys) and other off the shelf routers it seems some will only go for brands with their own proprietary firmware?

        I grabbed that Xiaomi router on the premise it has OpenWRT, but I’d like to see Ubi / Unifi routers put under the same scrutiny instead of just lumping a brand name as a no-go.

        What’s your recommendation?

        • SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 days ago

          Mine was a half-joke, but it’s not the first time chinese hardware was caught sending data around. Now I can’t recommend anything specific since the last time I bought a router was ages ago, and even though having one running OpenWRT is good I’d avoid it to be on the safer side.

      • philpo@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        12 days ago

        Fairly popular in my neck of the woods and rock solid. I literally had a bad sparky put 230V through one of them. It killed the RJ45, it killed two client hosts on the same bridge, it killed the port, but the Switch itself continued to work. (Still replaced it, though)

        The only thing I find them really bad and ironically replaced them with TP-Link (Omada )is Wifi. (and the fact that they let the promising “The Dude” die).

        Security wise they seem to do their homework so far.

        • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          12 days ago

          Fun fact I made my sales team standardize on Omada for all network hardware we are providing (highrise security systems, so SDN is usually out of scope) I was considering replacing my ubiquiti AC Pro soon, but I didn’t settle on a new model of access point yet. What are the mikrotik wifi APs bad at? if it’s meshing I will only have one.

          I didn’t look at The Dude before, but it doesn’t seem depreciated?

          • philpo@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 days ago

            Their solution to central management (Capsman) is a burning mess, when WiFi6 came out for a long time(I think 2 years) you were unable to keep older and newer APs on the same controller, so you needed two Capsman instances. Roaming between them is very unreliable and generally their hardware is underwhelming in terms of antenna quality, etc.

            For one AP it is not as bad, but still annoying, if you want to centrally manage more APs it is a nightmare.

            I replaced my MK APs with Omada with the software controller on a LXC and couldn’t be happier - they play along nicely with my MT infrastructure and are way more reliable.

            I really love MT,but not their WiFi.

      • felbane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 days ago

        Mikrotik is pretty decent but their configuration method drives me up a wall. Ansible helps mitigate the annoyance, at least (in that I only have to figure out/remember the arcane incantation for configuring VLANs once, and then subsequently just have the machine do it).

      • exu@feditown.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 days ago

        Mikrotik is great for features, but their UI definitely feels ancient and you will sometimes question why something takes this many steps.
        However, I’ve never had an plan I couldn’t replicate with their routers.

      • ladfrombrad 🇬🇧@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        Never used them pal, but seen them used in Enterprise environments?

        Something I’ve found on a SOHO environment though and what I bought a family member?

        Gli-Net mini routers. They come with OpenWRT as a base and then lipstick it with a nice interface. But as always, YMMV

        • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          Years ago, another trade worker on a construction site was using their wifi stuff, and mentioned using it at home. I went and picked up the hexPOE router and i’m pretty happy with it, but all i’m doing is port forwarding and I set up a rule to capture all DNS requests and shunt them into my pihole.

          The documentation is pretty spiffy and public.

          I’m not really sure if this seems good because I don’t know any better, or it’s good because it’s good.

          edit Gli-net seems nice, but i’m a stickler of using a WAP separate from the router. I know I pay more.

          • ladfrombrad 🇬🇧@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 days ago

            edit Gli-net seems nice, but i’m a stickler of using a WAP separate from the router. I know I pay more.

            It’s exactly why I bought her two of them. One their main router and the other in AP mode ;)